Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Parshotam [2016] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...stinging rebuke. However, I was made aware of S and K’s relationship breakdown and the emotional turmoil that they have endured recently … That being said, I am still extremely disappointed that I have been dragged into what I consider is a private matter between S and K.” [17] Later he said: “I attended on all five parties for signing of the documents on 2 July 2014.” [18] That was a barefaced lie. And later: “To my utter disbelief, I received an email from K’s fath...

2. [2016] NZEnvC 152 Koha Trust Holdings Limited v Constellation Brands New Zealand Limited [pdf, 735 KB]

   ...interpretation is necessary to serve the purpose of the Act, enabling the Council to manage environmental effects and risk in connection with the water resource. We agree with the submission by Mr Maassen 14 that water is a community resource, not private, although this finding is not necessary to support our other findings. (d) t~ strict interpretation of s 125(1A)(a) RMA would create too much uncertainty concerning the status of a consent" [50] Mr Maassen acknowledged th...

3. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence - Stephen Chiles [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...consideration of the existing environment. 38. For other projects I have found that background sound level measurements have only provided limited value in the acoustics assessment, and often they need to be repeated due to the delay between initial investigations and wind farm construction. For example, if I had conducted background sound measurements at the time of my assessment in 2013, they would probably need to be repeated prior to SCG-010 10 CFH-309448-3-451-V2...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 51 O’Boyle v McCue [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...in which Ms O’Boyle was the sole 1 McCue v O’Boyle Law Ltd [2019] NZERA 648 (Member Arthur). shareholder and director. However Ms O’Boyle conceded this point during the Authority investigation. She accepted she employed Ms McCue in her personal capacity in 2014. No formalities were agreed and completed to transfer the employment relationship to the company after it was registered in 2016. Ms O’Boyle remained pers...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 142 Neil Construction Limited v Far North District Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...(133) and other site features including a central through road that would have required filling a stream and wetland gully system. No recreation reserves were proposed at that time. Land adjacent to the Rangitane River would have remained in private lot ownership, as large lots ranging between 8,000m2 to four hectares in size. [63] Currently, the proposal sees a reduction of the overall number of residential lots proposed (from 133 to 119), the addition of a reserve (Lot 701) to b...

6. NZCVS Cycle 3 topical report final - patterns of victimisation by family members and help-seeking by victims [pdf, 1 MB]

   Patterns of victimisation by family members and help-seeking by victims February 2022 Results drawn from Cycle 1 (2018) and Cycle 3 (2019/20) of the New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey (NZCVS) 2 ISBN 978-0-473-61896-4 Published in February 2022 By The Ministry of Justice Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088, Wellington New Zealand ISBN: 978-0-473-61896-4 Suggested citat

7. 2017 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   ...serious emotional distress. Since coming into force in July 2015, dozens of offenders have been held to account. The Act established an approved agency to handle complaints and educate the public about online conduct. NetSafe was chosen to assess, investigate and deal with complaints. The Act also introduced a civil court process for serious or repeated harmful digital communications. Netsafe has received more than 1100 requests for help since November 2016. The courts have recei...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 231 Premier Events Group Ltd and Anor v Beattie and Ors [pdf, 685 KB]

   PREMIER EVENTS GROUP LIMITED v MALCOLM JAMES BEATTIE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 231 [17 December 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 231 ARC 22/11 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PREMIER EVENTS GROUP LIMITED First Plaintiff AND BA PARTNERS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) Second Plaintiff AND MALCOLM JAMES BEATTIE First Defendant AN

9. Turuki! Turuki! Moving Together [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   P. 1 Turuki! Turuki! Move together! Transforming our criminal justice system The second report of Te Uepū Hāpai i Te Ora Safe and Effective Justice Advisory Group P. 2 Paneke! Paneke! First principles, first steps. Te Uepū Hāpai i te Ora is grateful to Justice Joe Williams and Dr Kārena Kelly for the naming of this report. We are also grateful for Dr Kelly's advice on the use of te reo Māori in fully expressing our vision and values. P. 3 It is more tha

10. [2023] NZEnvC 156 The Bears Home Project Management Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.7 MB]

    The Bears Home Project Management Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 156 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN THE BEARS HOME PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-000017) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND NGĀ MAUNGA WHAKAHII O KAIPARA DEVELOPMENT TRUST Section 274 party Court: Judge J A Smi