3033 items matching your search terms
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 37 LCDT 019/16 UNDER the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND CHRISTOPHER TWIGLEY Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr J Bishop Mr W Chapman Mr M Gough Mr A Marshall HEARING at Wellington Tribunals DATE OF HEARING 2 and 3 November 2016 DATE OF DECISION 19 Decembe
...years, dealt primarily with Mr JB, a partner of Mr AD’s. [139] Mr AD explained that his firm had represented Mr FE in the following transactions: (a) 2004: purchase of a property. (b) 2008: purchase of a business. (c) 2014: purchase of a private property. (d) 2012: executing a personal mortgage. (e) 2013: sale of a residential property. (f) 2015: preparation of a trust deed. (g) 2016: sale of a business. [140] Of the transactions detailed above, Mr AD says that his invol...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 159 Ref: LCRO 29/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN CP Applicant AND SW and KM Respondents DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The appli
Responding Together: An Integrated Report Evaluating the Aims of the Waitakere Family Violence Court Protocols Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Mandy Morgan, Leigh Coombes, Erika Te Hiwi and Sarah McGray, Massey University Responding Together Published in August 2008 by Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand 2008 © Crown
...provisions, must have hybrid TC2/TC3 foundations designed in accordance with the MBIE guidelines “Repairing and rebuilding houses affected by the Canterbury earthquakes”, Part C section 15.4.6, with reference to the KGA Geotechnical Engineering Investigation K211163-1 dated 14 February 2023 held on Council electronic file 23/1334124. 3. The foundation system must be subject to specific engineering design, observation and certification by a suitably experienced chartered structural eng...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT WELLINGTON REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE ENV-2023-WLG-000005 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER the direct referral of applications for resource consents and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project BY WAKA KOTAHI NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MARK LESLIE ST CLAIR ON BEHALF OF
...replacement as one example and the voiding issue as another, where Mr Weber allowed himself to be pressured by Mr Cowie into maintaining a position that was not professionally sustainable. [45] Mr Lewis was challenged about his association with a private company offering professional indemnity insurance to engineers. Although he may be neither a shareholder nor an officer in that company, he attends its board meetings and has intimate knowledge of its insurance arrangements...
...included as they may, after construction, be sold and therefore remain part of the environment during operation of the Project when they will be subject to operational noise. Page 9 proposed designation corridor, but there are six which are privately owned and/or outside the proposed designation corridor. NZS 6806 considers that noise within Category A levels, which will be achieved at all other dwellings, allows for reasonable residential amenity and some protection from...
...September 2017 once the issue had been identified. He explained the error. While Mr Greetham’s role in the misunderstanding is mentioned, the email letter does not appear to attempt to make Mr Greetham solely responsible. However, it seems that privately Mr Yates believed responsibility lay with Mr Greetham. He believed that if Mr Greetham had continued attending environmental health and safety seminars and networking events he would have been aware of the MHF Regulations. In...
...particular complaints. Undue pressure on the appellant to carry out repairs to the property prior to sale [12] In this part of her complaint, the appellant asserted that improper pressure had been brought to bear on her by Licensee 1. The investigator noted that the appellant confirmed that: Licensee one pressured the complainant into doing work around the property. [13] In the usual way, we will attempt to assess the quality of the evidence by comparing it to the contempor...