Search Results

1. LCRO 2011 Annual Report [pdf, 919 KB]

   ...Standards Committee decision is reversed, modified or referred back to the Standards Committee for reconsideration. A reversal of a Standards Committee decision usually results in the LCRO substituting that decision for their own following inquires or an investigation. In some occasions, the vacation of a Standards Committee decision can result in the matter being referred back to Standards Committee to consider afresh. These constitute a fully successful review application. A partly succ...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 156 The Bears Home Project Management Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   The Bears Home Project Management Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 156 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN THE BEARS HOME PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-000017) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND NGĀ MAUNGA WHAKAHII O KAIPARA DEVELOPMENT TRUST Section 274 party Court: Judge J A Smi

3. Responding together: an integrated report evaluating the aims of the Waitakere Family Violence Court protocols [pdf, 894 KB]

   Responding Together: An Integrated Report Evaluating the Aims of the Waitakere Family Violence Court Protocols Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Mandy Morgan, Leigh Coombes, Erika Te Hiwi and Sarah McGray, Massey University Responding Together Published in August 2008 by Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand 2008 © Crown

4. Wellington Standards Committee v Twigley [2016] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 601 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 37 LCDT 019/16 UNDER the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND CHRISTOPHER TWIGLEY Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr J Bishop Mr W Chapman Mr M Gough Mr A Marshall HEARING at Wellington Tribunals DATE OF HEARING 2 and 3 November 2016 DATE OF DECISION 19 Decembe

5. LCRO 119/2021 FE v AD of [Firm 1] (14 October 2022) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...years, dealt primarily with Mr JB, a partner of Mr AD’s. [139] Mr AD explained that his firm had represented Mr FE in the following transactions: (a) 2004: purchase of a property. (b) 2008: purchase of a business. (c) 2014: purchase of a private property. (d) 2012: executing a personal mortgage. (e) 2013: sale of a residential property. (f) 2015: preparation of a trust deed. (g) 2016: sale of a business. [140] Of the transactions detailed above, Mr AD says that his invol...

6. LCRO 29/2023 CP v SW and KM (19 December 2023) [pdf, 245 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 159 Ref: LCRO 29/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN CP Applicant AND SW and KM Respondents DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The appli

7. Turuki! Turuki! Moving Together [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   P. 1 Turuki! Turuki! Move together! Transforming our criminal justice system The second report of Te Uepū Hāpai i Te Ora Safe and Effective Justice Advisory Group P. 2 Paneke! Paneke! First principles, first steps. Te Uepū Hāpai i te Ora is grateful to Justice Joe Williams and Dr Kārena Kelly for the naming of this report. We are also grateful for Dr Kelly's advice on the use of te reo Māori in fully expressing our vision and values. P. 3 It is more tha

8. [2024] NZEnvC 173 Habitus Group Limited v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 23 MB]

   ...provisions, must have hybrid TC2/TC3 foundations designed in accordance with the MBIE guidelines “Repairing and rebuilding houses affected by the Canterbury earthquakes”, Part C section 15.4.6, with reference to the KGA Geotechnical Engineering Investigation K211163-1 dated 14 February 2023 held on Council electronic file 23/1334124. 3. The foundation system must be subject to specific engineering design, observation and certification by a suitably experienced chartered structural eng...

9. 2023-09-27-SOE_Mark-St-Clair_Planning-+-Attachments.pdf [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT WELLINGTON REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE ENV-2023-WLG-000005 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER the direct referral of applications for resource consents and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project BY WAKA KOTAHI NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MARK LESLIE ST CLAIR ON BEHALF OF

10. B R L v EQC & IAG New Zealand Ltd [2020] CEIT-2020-0051 [pdf, 934 KB]

    ...replacement as one example and the voiding issue as another, where Mr Weber allowed himself to be pressured by Mr Cowie into maintaining a position that was not professionally sustainable. [45] Mr Lewis was challenged about his association with a private company offering professional indemnity insurance to engineers. Although he may be neither a shareholder nor an officer in that company, he attends its board meetings and has intimate knowledge of its insurance arrangements...