[2020] NZEmpC 174 Greetham v Lawter (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 384 KB]
...September 2017 once the issue had been identified. He explained the error. While Mr Greetham’s role in the misunderstanding is mentioned, the email letter does not appear to attempt to make Mr Greetham solely responsible. However, it seems that privately Mr Yates believed responsibility lay with Mr Greetham. He believed that if Mr Greetham had continued attending environmental health and safety seminars and networking events he would have been aware of the MHF Regulations. In...