Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 150 Hamilton Homezone Limited v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 26 MB]

   ...with the findings of the qualitative drawdown settlement set out within the geotechnical report prepared by Cheal, dated 22 June 2020. Drawdown settlement should be confirmed at detailed design/building consent stage with site-specific ground investigations and appropriate lab testing followed by a quantitative analysis. All testing should be identified and analysis should be performed by a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist conversant with the local...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 320 New Zealand Transport Agency - Waka Kotahi [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   RE NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY – WAKA KOTAHI IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision [2024] NZEnvC 320 IN THE MATTER of a direct referral of applications for resource consents and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Resource Management Act 1991 for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY-WAKA KOTAHI (ENV-2023-WLG-000005) Applicant Court: Environment Ju

3. Houlbrooke (2010) Matching farm dairy effluent storage requirements and management practices to soil and landscape features [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...breakthrough curve (McLeod et al. 2008) or as the uneven and elongated depth distribution of an applied tracer (Monaghan et al. 1999, McLeod et al. 1998). McLeod et al. (2008) have provided a summary of previous research conducted by Landcare Research investigating the potential for preferential flow across a wide range of New Zealand soil types and characteristics. Matching FDE storage requirements with soil and landscape risk 16 Report for Environment Waikato June 2010 S...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 250 Granger & Ors v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 13 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [20181 NZEnvC 250 of the Resource Management Act 1991· of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act GRAEME GRANGER, CRAIG WERNER, HAMISH FORRESTER, KATRINA BERKENBUSCH, MEGAN BARDELL, TOM MYERS (ENV-2017 -CHC-038) Appellants DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent PENINSULA HOLDINGS TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commission

5. NZCASS 2014 Data items variables list [xls, 373 KB]

   Contents 2014 Data Item (Variable) List Contents 1 Administration 2 Demographics 3 Geographic 4 Imputation level - incidence and prevalence 5 Incident level - victim experience 6 Incident level - reporting to Police 7 Incident level - offence codes 8 Lifetime experience and coercive control 9 Perceptions of the criminal justice system and awareness of agencies 10 Perceptions of neighbourhood crime and disorder 11 Perceptions of safety and victimisation risk 12 Security

6. [2011] NZEmpC 1 Gyenge v Clifford Lamar Limited [pdf, 221 KB]

   EMMA GYENGE V CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEMPC 1 [10 January 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEMPC 1 ARC 65/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN EMMA GYENGE Plaintiff AND CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10 November 2010 11 November 2010 22 November 2010 Appearances: Jan Gyenge, Agent for Plaintiff Clifford Harris, Agent for Defendant Ju

7. Dawson v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Wellington 36 [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...reclad for the home with his estimate of remedial costs to achieve CCC at $326,000. WHAT ARE THE DEFECTS CAUSING WATER INGRESS? [56] The Council expert Mr Jones carried out a visual inspection in August 2010 and has considered photo and investigation reports from the other two experts. An experts‟ conference was convened on 4 May 2011. This conference concluded with a report from Mr Light, Mr Hill and Mr Jones‟ setting down ten probable defects. The experts were heard...

8. Proprietors of Potikirua Block Incorporated v Te Kani - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 8212 [2013] Chief Judge's MB 82 (2013 CJ 82) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   2013 Chief Judge's MB 82 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20110012322 CJ 2011/44 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 1 Deposited Plan 8212 formerly pati of Potikirua Incorporation BETWEEN The Proprietors of Potikirua Block Incorporation Applicant AND Parekura Te Kani (now deceased) Respondent Hearing: 16 December 2011,45 Waiariki MB 47-48 9 March 2012,2012 Chief Judge's MB 87 10 July 2012,23 Tairawhiti MB 2

9. LCRO 173/2014 G NP and H NP v DC (27 September 2018) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” …

10. LCRO 3/2024 RP v TG (21 May 2024) [pdf, 262 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 051 Ref: LCRO 003/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RP Applicant AND TG Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant, Mrs