3087 items matching your search terms
[2025] NZPSPLA 013 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by The Police under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against JOSEPH HILLMAN HEARD remotely on 7 February 2025 APPEARANCES Constable D Gillies for NZ Police J Hillman – no appearance DECISION [1] Police have applied to cancel Joseph Hillman’s certificate of approval as he has recently been convicted of indecent assault. This conviction is grounds for disquali...
[2025] NZPSPLA 003 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by The Police under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the PSPPI Act) against MARCUS GARDNER HEARD remotely on 17 January 2025 APPEARANCES Snr Constable P Wylie for NZ Police M Gardner – no appearance DECISION [1] Police have made a complaint against Marcus Gardner as he has been convicted of several offences since he was granted his certificate of approval (COA) in January...
[2024] NZPSPLA 089 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by Police under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 Act (the Act) against PETER NGATUAKANA HEARD on the papers DECISION [1] Police are asking for Peter Ngatuakana’s security certificate to be cancelled as he has been sentenced to nine months imprisonment after being convicted of wilful damage, assault, assaulting a child and refusing an officer’s request to give blood. The prison...
[2024] NZPSPLA 121 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by The Police under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against BILLY TAINEFU HEARD remotely on 20 December 2024 APPEARANCES Snr Constable T Pillay for NZ Police B Tainefu – no appearance DECISION [1] Police say Billy Tainefu is no longer suitable to hold a security certificate due to his recent offending and subsequent convictions. On 21 November 2024 Mr Tainefu wa...
[2025] NZPSPLA 058 IN THE MATTER OF a complaint by The Police under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against EUNICE FOORD HEARD remotely on 9 June 2025 APPEARANCES Senior Constable T Pillay for NZ Police E Foord – no appearance DECISION [1] Police are asking for Eunice Foord’s certificate of approval to be cancelled as she has been convicted of burglary and sentenced to 80 hours community work and 1 year of s...
[2025] NZPSPLA 059 IN THE MATTER OF a complaint by The Police under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against MORONI TO’O HEARD on the papers DECISION [1] In March 2025 Moroni To’o was granted a temporary certificate of approval (COA) after passing the criminal history check. In May 2025 Police filed a complaint against Mr To’o as he was facing a representative charge of rape and charges of sexual connection wit...
[2025] NZPSPLA 079 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint under s 74 of The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against VICTOR LEFAOSEU HEARD remotely on 11 August 2025 APPEARANCES Sgt D Greaney for NZ Police V Lefaoseu – no appearance DECISION [1] In December 2024 Police made a complaint against Victor Lefaoseu after he had been charged with firearms, drugs and driving offences. Other than suspending Mr Lefaoseu’s certificate of...
...Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator and seek and receive evidence. These powers extend to “any review” … … the power of review is much broader tha...
...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pro...
...Tribunal orders: TE is to pay $3,405.76 to BS on or before 30 June 2025. Brief Details of Claim 1. TE owns a premises in [suburb] from which he provides a storage facility for vehicles, a vehicle valet service, and he also sells vehicles for private owners. All of these services are provided in return for a negotiated fee. 2. TL previously owned a [camper van]. She entered into a contract with TE to advertise and sell the van for her. TL paid $1,000 to TE for this service....