Search Results

1. LC v Q Ltd [2025] NZDT 94 (26 May 2025) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: 1. LC is not liable to pay $513.44 to Q Ltd. 2. LC’s claim that Q Ltd pay $59.00 to her is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 8 November 2024 a [vehicle] owned by LC, but driven by someone else, parked on private premises at [address]. The parks are clearly labelled ‘LAUNDROMAT PARKING ONLY, TOW AWAY’ and a sign ‘NO PARKING, PRIVATE PROPERTY, VEHICLES PARKED HERE WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY OF THE OWNER OF THIS CARPARK WILL BE ISSUED WITH AN INF...

2. AB v ZY LCRO 54 / 2010 (27 January 2011) [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...at that stage to the Lay Observer. The Lay Observer returned the file to the Law Society for review and for a decision to be made on the complaint. 3 [17] The Law Society’s investigating solicitor had concerns about processing the investigation while the MoH inquiry was under way, as, in his view, the two inquiries were in respect of the same matter and the Respondent was thereby being subjected to double jeopardy. [18] In August 2007, however, the investigating solici...

3. Recontact panel application form [docx, 132 KB]

   ...recontact database 3 Eligibility 3 Assessment criteria 4 Dissemination and publication 4 Submitting your application 4 Research topic 5 Relevance and impact 6 Methodology 7 Use of the recontact database 8 Budget 9 Researchers and collaborators 10 Principal investigator 10 Co-researchers and collaborators 10 Other 11 Declarations 12 Key facts about the NZCVS 13 [bookmark: _Toc162261195]About the recontact database The NZCVS recontact database comprises all NZCVS respondents who have consented...

4. 2020 NZPSPLA 012 [pdf, 66 KB]

   [2020] NZPSPLA 012 Case number 005064 / 2019 IN THE MATTER OF The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by the Police under s 74 of the Act against SUNDEEP RASILA Heard By Telephone on 22 June 2020 DECISION [1] Sundeep Rasila holds a certificate of approval in the classes of crowd controller, property guard and personal guard. On 12 May 2020 Mr Rasila was convicted of corruption / bribery of an offic...

5. 2023 NZPSPLA 013.pdf [pdf, 78 KB]

   [2023] NZPSPLA 013 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint made under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 AGAINST CJ DECISION [1] The Police have filed an objection against CJ, however as it was filed late and he had already been issued with a Certificate of Approval (COA), it has been treated as a complaint pursuant to s74 of the Act. CJ currently holds a COA in the classes of property guard, personal guard, document destr...

6. 2022 NZPSPLA 020.pdf [pdf, 76 KB]

   NZPSPLA 020 IN THE MATTER OF The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF An application for a Certificate of Approval by GT DECISION [1] GT applied for a Certificate of Approval (COA), with a temporary COA in the classes of crowd controller, property guard and personal guard. He is not eligible for a temporary COA as he has disqualifying convictions. [2] Given his convictions, GT was directed to provide...

7. 2023 NZPSPLA 061 [pdf, 81 KB]

   [2023] NZPSPLA 061 IN THE MATTER OF Objection by the POLICE against KJ under sections 49 and 62 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 HEARD virtually on 14 September 2023 APPEARANCES KJ Senior Constable Donaldson for the Police DECISION 1. Upon provision of a reference, KJ’ Certificate of Approval is approved on the following conditions: i. That he complete the 1:1 counselling sessions through Te Whatu Ora he has bee...

8. INZ (Foley) v De'Ath [2018] NZIACDT 51 (19 December 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...telephone interview with a former employer of Mr De’Ath’s client. That former employer had denied making the statement attributed to him by Ms L, but Ms L continued to maintain that the statement had been made. Mr De’Ath had also threatened a private prosecution of Ms L for what he alleged to be her misuse of public funds. He did not elaborate how this could come about. [5] Mr De’Ath’s complaint against Ms L had been investigated by Ms M, a manager at Immigration New...

9. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...HRA requires the decision-maker to be “satisfied” that it is “necessary” in the “interests of justice” to preserve the position of the parties. Before these terms are addressed it is helpful to place HRA s 95 in the broader context of private and public law. The power to make an interim order – comparisons [29] Both Private Law and Public Law recognise interim orders and injunctions. [30] In civil proceedings High Court Rules, r 7.53 allows application to be made for an...

10. Waitangi Tribunal theme Q - Foreshore [pdf, 559 KB]

    ...re Ninety Mile Beach.4 This decision will be discussed fully below. For the present it can be noted that in the Court of Appeal’s view there is a vital connection between the Crown’s putative ownership of the foreshore and the process of title investigation carried on by the Native Land Court operating under the Native Lands Acts.The key matter to emphasise is that a separate Rangihaua Whanui report on the ‘foreshore’ arises not from any concepts or categories recognised by Maori...