Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Taffs [2015] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 34 KB]
...now in place will ensure no repetition. [29] Mr Taffs is absolutely adamant (and there is no evidence to the contrary) that he has never taken fees directly from clients who are legally aided. He has at times represented the same client either privately or on a Legal Aid basis at different times. [30] We accept Mr Upton’s submission that this is not a case of: “… A practitioner deliberately, wilfully and knowingly defying requests by an Inspector. Instead it is more properl...