Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 025 Minister of Conservation v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 5.5 MB]

   ...– Continue to gather information on the state of biodiversity in terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments in Marlborough to enable decision makers to assess the impact on biodiversity values from various activities and uses. Survey work on private land through programmes run by the Council and Department of Conservation has provided an overview of biodiversity in Marlborough. However, while many landowners have had their land surveyed as part of these programmes, not all land ha...

2. TC & QC v FT & TT [2025] NZDT 71 (6 March 2025) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...the time? (f) Is QC entitled to a remedy and, if so, what should that remedy be? Page 2 of 6 Did FT make a representation to QC about the [vehicle]? 6. Generally, the rule of Caveat Emptor (‘let the buyer beware’) applies to the private sale of goods and there is no warranty regarding the quality of the goods or their fitness for purpose. The rule of Caveat Emptor means that a seller in private contractual negotiations is generally under no obligation to ensure that t...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 238 AsiaCiti Trust NZ Ltd v Harris [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...Zealand based independent trustee providing services to offshore clients. Ms Lauren Willis, the General Manager of Asiaciti, stated in evidence that the nature of New Zealand trust legislation creates an attractive environment for non-resident private investors to use New Zealand trusts to hold international investments and private assets. She stated that these New Zealand trusts provide non-resident investors with a globally recognised structure for tax effective preservation of...

4. Teina Pora compensation claim quantum report [pdf, 9 MB]

   ...Pora's conduct .......................................................................................................... 13 Whether the prosecution acted in good faith .................... .... ........................................ is Whether the investigation was conducted in a reasonable and proper manner .......... 18 Failure to re-evaluate the case ..................................... ..................... .. ................ .... 18 Witnesses of questionable credibility .....

5. CAC 10054 v Subritzky [2012] NZREADT 20 [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...pursued me. 6. When I came back to the entrance of Now Realty, the director, Monica Subritzky, pulled up in her car. The defendant handed the documents to her. I then left. 7. On 30 July 2010, I received instructions from Mike Dingwall, Private Investigator to attempt service on the defendant Robert (known as Frank) Subritzky, and Arthur Subritzky. 8. On Monday 2 August 2010, at around 12.15pm, I again went to the premises of Now Realty in order to serve documents on th...

6. Territorial Authorities - J Muir - Supplementary - 12 May 2021.pdf [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Alexandra. A map is attached in Appendix [3]. This shows the scheme being extended into a further four areas, being Airport, Airport Reserve/Hillview Road, Dunstan Flats, and Gilligans Gully/Letts Gully. These properties are currently serviced by private bores or water supplies and are not part of the existing Council water supply area. This will provide water which is compliant with the New Zealand Drinking Water Standards to these properties which currently have untreated wate...

7. Establishing a Criminal Cases Review Commission - Redacted [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...Court of Appeal High Court Court of equal standing to the one that made the original decision What powers does the Commission have during a review? • Obtain documents from any public office. • A court order for information from a private person. • Require police to appoint an investigating officer. • Obtain documents from any person or public office. • A court order to summon witnesses to testify • Require police to investigate new evidence • Summ...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 84 E Tū Inc v Singh [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...complaining that she had been harassed by two members of its staff. Mr Singh was one of the staff members she complained about; Mr Sehgal was the other. HVF threatened to go to the media if E tū did not address her concerns. E tū commenced an investigation, which led to Mr Singh’s dismissal some three weeks later. [5] Mr Singh filed a personal grievance, claiming unjustified dismissal and disadvantage. Mr Singh sought reinstatement to his role, a primary remedy under the...

9. Te Whare Maire Trust - Lot 5 DP 8663 (2005) 87 Ōpōtiki MB 238 (87 OPO 238) [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...them to contest the validity of Crown derived title over land that was formerly Maori customary land. Although ostensibly about this one block of land, the arguments made in support of the application demonstrated a desire to challenge all Crown or private title to land within the traditional territories of Upokorehe hapu of the Whakatohea Tribe. While detailed submissions were led regarding different statutes and the common law, it was clear to the Court during the course of these proce...

10. [2022] NZREADT 23 - CAC 1904 v Bright (8 November 2022) [pdf, 278 KB]

    ...with Mr Rutherford’s agency was terminated on 26 July 2019. [17] The Committee produced evidence from a number of witnesses. The complainant [18] There is a statement (10 December 2019) from the complainant, following an interview with an investigator from the Authority on the same day. She also gave oral evidence to the Tribunal. [19] It is relevant to note the complainant is of small stature, at just under [deleted]. [20] The complainant recounts going to the agency...