Search Results

1. Evidence Brief: Reintegration services [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community, and recidivism (CRS Report RL34287). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Petersilia, J. (2004). What works in prisoner reentry? Reviewing and questioning the evidence, Federal Probation, 68.2, 4-8. Seiter, R. & Kadela, K. (2003). Prisoner re-entry: what works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & delinquency, 49.3, 360-388. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2012). Introductory Hand...

2. Tapiki and Eru v New Zealand Parole Board [2019] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 403 KB]

   ...sentence was 28 November 2018. [8] Jesse was first released from this sentence on 9 November 2012. He was recalled in April 2013 as there were issues relating to his compliance with the conditions of his parole and with his engagement with his probation officer. [9] He was released again in June 2013 but recalled once more in October 2013 having received a warning from the Board at a progress hearing in September of that year. Again the concern related to his disengagement from parol...

3. Young-Adult-List-Operating-Guidelines2.pdf [pdf, 5.8 MB]

   ...and who is responsible for ensuring it is transferred from the Duty Lawyer to the assigned lawyer will depend on the court. Page 13 Sensitive Information Form There is a tool that any agency (including the defence lawyers, Prosecution, Probation and support agencies) can use when wanting to disclose information without requesting a closed court – the ‘Sensitive Information Form’. The form provides the ability for specific information to be “referred” to, but by u...

4. Young-Adult-List-Operating-Guidelines.pdf [pdf, 5.8 MB]

   ...and who is responsible for ensuring it is transferred from the Duty Lawyer to the assigned lawyer will depend on the court. Page 13 Sensitive Information Form There is a tool that any agency (including the defence lawyers, Prosecution, Probation and support agencies) can use when wanting to disclose information without requesting a closed court – the ‘Sensitive Information Form’. The form provides the ability for specific information to be “referred” to, but by u...

5. Justice Sector prison population forecast May 2010 update [pdf, 355 KB]

   ...8000 9000 J u n 0 6 D e c 0 6 J u n 0 7 D e c 0 7 J u n 0 8 D e c 0 8 J u n 0 9 D e c 0 9 J u n 1 0 D e c 1 0 J u n 1 1 D e c 1 1 J u n 1 2 N u m b e r re p o rt s/ st a rt s New Community Probation Service (CPS) starts and Pre-sentence reports CPS starts CPS starts forecast Probation reports Probation reports forecast 10 D: Key drivers of the prison forecast D.1: Numbers charged Comparison to assumptions 0...

6. Otago Standards Committee v Davidson [2012] NZLCDT 39 [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...of the moment it was submitted, to a desire to help the family. It was emphasised that this was not a matter where there was any personal benefit to Ms Davidson. [22] It was noted for Ms Davidson that there was no attempt by her to seek probate of the will concerned, and after Mrs J died on 12 November 2011 probate of the earlier will held by the Public Trustee was sought and obtained. [23] The stress being suffered by Ms Davidson at the time was raised as providing a con...

7. CS v HT and LM LCRO 25/2013, 50/2013 and 51/2013 (24 June 2014) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...AND MR HT MRS LM Introduction [1] Mr CS instructed ABC law firm to act on his behalf in proceedings in which he alleged that his sister lacked testamentary capacity to make a will of which the [organisation] had applied for a grant of probate. Mr HT and Mrs LM were the lawyers who had the carriage of those matters. [2] Mr CS has sought a review of two determinations of the Standards Committee in which the Committee determined to take no further action in respect of the...

8. Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court Outcomes Evaluation 2018-19: Summary Evaluation Report [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Court has developed over the course of the pilot, including the integration of tikanga and te reo Māori. Additionally, graduates are now sentenced to Intensive Supervision with Judicial monitoring, resulting in continuing oversight by Judges and Probation Officers for up to two years post sentence, and they are subject to ongoing drug testing. These changes may result in improved results for later participants and graduates. However, the effect of these improvements has not been ab...

9. Puna v Puna - Rotopounamu 1B1A [2022] Chief Judges MB 28 (2022 CJ 28) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...[6] Ms Bartlett passed away in 1979. She left a will dated 28 July 1977 and a codicil dated 4 February 1979. The codicil to Ms Bartlett’s will stated that the land of her father’s house site is to be divided equally between her nine siblings. Probate was granted on 17 July 1981. [7] The relevant legislation at the time the order was made was the Māori Affairs Amendment Act 1967. Section 81A of this Act concerned the transfer of interests in 2022 Chief Judge’s MB 30...

10. LCRO 16/2014 YC v TX [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...applied for a review of the determination by Area Standards Committee X to take no further action in respect of his complaints about Mr TX. Background [2] Mr YC’s father died on 27 January 2008. Mr YC was appointed executor of his will and Probate of the will was granted on 12 October 2009. [3] A statement of Assets and Liabilities prepared by Mr TX on 15 January 2010 shows the net balance of the estate to be $XX while Judge X in Family Court proceedings noted that “in gen...