LCRO 223/2018 UT v VU (20 March 2019) [pdf, 96 KB]
...INZ that he was at low risk of reoffending, and unlikely to commit further offences. Mr UT had already provided INZ with a certificate from the [COUNTRY] police which suggests it was satisfied that Mr UT was low risk. Mr UT had also provided a probation report which is generally supportive of the position he sought to adopt. [11] The first point to note is that although Mr VU could provide advice, he could not change history. However much Mr UT might want to change the past, his...