[2020] NZEmpC 30 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 163 KB]
...the way in which the Authority Member has approached issues such as costs in the past and supports his argument that he has suffered reputational damage as a result of the Authority’s determination in this case. Mr Samuels also says that the probative value of recordings, even where they might have been improperly obtained, may nevertheless lead to them being admitted in evidence. [12] I fail to see how the recording is relevant to the matters at issue in the judicial review...