LCRO 152/2015 FR v CB and WT (15 May 2017) [pdf, 200 KB]
...unsatisfactory to FR as his application failed. That does not mean to say that the lawyers have failed in their duty to FR or that the charging regime has been in any way wrong. 12 There was nothing other than the lodging of the caveat against probate which appeared to be of an urgent nature which warranted an uplift. [8] LT concluded that the lawyers’ bills of costs were fair and reasonable. The Standards Committee decision [9] The Standards Committee recorded that: 13 10...