Search Results

Search results for probate.

993 items matching your search terms

  1. [2007] NZEmpC CC 21/07 Gorrie Fuel (SI) Ltd v Gittoes [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...of which was to criticise Mr Gittoes’ performance while he was employed by Peter Thompson Limited. Mr Twomey objected to this evidence at the time and, while allowing Mr Gorrie to proceed, I warned him that it appeared to be of little or no probative value and was most unlikely to assist me. I confirm that I found that evidence of no value in deciding the issues before me and have had no regard to it in my decision. I also record that I have drawn no conclusions about Mr Gittoe...

  2. EMPC Memorial sitting John Haigh QC [pdf, 180 KB]

    ...when you are being nice”. John had a great sense of the ridiculous and in that same case he took the full Bench of this Court through the various paraphernalia and methods that were employed to beat drug testing. The evidence was of little probative value but was hugely fascinating. In fact, poring through “beatyourdrugtest.com” was one of the first times John, a relative technophobe, took a real interest in the Internet. John took on hard cases and gave hard advice if it...

  3. Foreman v Sanders – Estate of Rachel Ngeungeu Zister (2013) 63 Waikato Maniapoto MB 286 (63 WMN 286) [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...the owner of lands in the Maraetai district of Auckland and while alive utilised some of those lands for the establishment of a Ngai Tai marae at Umupuia. [2] Rachel Zister died on 22 May 1997 aged 104. She left a Will dated 24 January 1996.1 Probate was granted in the High Court at Auckland on 11 August 1997 and Janice Sanders and Maurice Wilson were appointed as the executors of the estate. [3] This case concerns the interpretation of the late Mrs Zister’s Will. The subject...

  4. Beatson v CAC 416, Cripsin, Mordaunt & Property Brokers Ltd [2019] NZREADT 25 (9 July 2019) [pdf, 521 KB]

    ...explains this document on the grounds that he did not carefully check the document which he signed and contained the acknowledgement in question. That is to say; he explains the position because he was careless. [19] For Mr Beatson to counter the probative effect of the signed acknowledgement, he has to establish that it is more likely than not that the acknowledgement was signed in such circumstances. He has not done so. We will discuss briefly the reasons why we take that view....

  5. Welcome Guide Information for court and tribunal interpreters v2.pdf [docx, 1.7 MB]

    ...hearing Once the hearing has finished, the judicial officer may consider whether you should also: · interpret the outcome of proceedings, including any orders made or bail conditions imposed · interpret for the defendant to facilitate communication with probation, health officials and report writers for any pre-sentencing reports · inform the person you are interpreting of any future hearings, or that they are dismissed from future events. This is to ensure that the party who required the...

  6. LCRO 18/2021 MB v RP and ND (14 October 2022) [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...Standards Committee X (the Committee) to take no further action in respect of his complaint concerning the conduct of Mr RP and Mr ND, trustees of a family trust established pursuant to the will of his late father, Mr GB. [2] Mr GB died in 2012. Probate of Mr GB's will was granted by the High Court in 2013 to his wife Mrs HB, and to their children, Mr MB, Mr IB, Ms JH, Ms WP, and to Mr GB’s lawyer, Mr KV (the executors).1 1 Will dated 10 December 1998; Codicil dated 21...

  7. Welcome Guide Information for court and tribunal interpreters v6 [docx, 1.7 MB]

    ...hearing Once the hearing has finished, the judicial officer may consider whether you should also: · interpret the outcome of proceedings, including any orders made or bail conditions imposed · interpret for the defendant to facilitate communication with probation, health officials and report writers for any pre-sentencing reports · inform the person you are interpreting of any future hearings, or that they are dismissed from future events. This is to ensure that the party who required the...

  8. Welcome-Guide-Information-for-court-and-tribunal-interpreters-v5.docx [docx, 1.7 MB]

    ...hearing Once the hearing has finished, the judicial officer may consider whether you should also: · interpret the outcome of proceedings, including any orders made or bail conditions imposed · interpret for the defendant to facilitate communication with probation, health officials and report writers for any pre-sentencing reports · inform the person you are interpreting of any future hearings, or that they are dismissed from future events. This is to ensure that the party who required the...

  9. OIA-124645.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    ...specific context. Funding for post-court engagement • Unless directed by the court, it can be problematic for a participant to access communication assistance for processes that occur ‘after’ court. Examples are easy- read bail conditions, probation or e-bail assessments, parole hearings, understanding the verdict or sentence, and writing a victim impact statement. Document 2 RE LE AS ED U ND ER T HE O FF IC IA L IN FO RM AT IO N AC T 19 82 12...