Tangi v ACC [2012] NZACA 4 [pdf, 119 KB]
...in any replacement legislation, or in Campbell (supra) as to the nature of the evidence to be lead to satisfy the requirements of s 80(3). The issue is the relevance of the evidence given and the weight that should be given to it and relevant or probative evidence should not be excluded simply because it is not medical evidence. Condliffe v ACC (AP 274/02). [41] The Authority’s traditional approach to cases where the Corporation has wrongly destroyed a claim file that would othe...