Search Results

1. TXY v Police [2025] NZHRRT 31 [pdf, 358 KB]

   ...of law. … [10] Under the Evidence Act 2006, relevance is the fundamental principle that guides admissibility. All relevant evidence is admissible while irrelevant evidence is not.6 Even if evidence is admissible, it must be excluded if its probative value is outweighed by the risk that the evidence will have an unfairly prejudicial effect on the hearing or will needlessly prolong it.7 [11] Section 106 of the HRA permits the Tribunal to depart from these principles, but onl...

2. OIA-112335.pdf [pdf, 27 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 16 July 2024 Our ref: OIA 112335 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Three strikes legislation I refer to your email of 29 April 2024 to the Department of Corrections (Corrections), requesting information relating to the Three Strikes sentencing legislation. On 21 May 2024, you were notified by Corrections that your requ

3. Pou - Eru Moka and Te Owai Pou Whanau Trust (2013) 61 Taitokerau MB 247 (61 TTK 247) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...daughters. Filed in support of the application was the High Court’s 1990 grant of letters of administration with will annexed in favour of Mira Norris and two of her sisters, Ruka Latimer and Atareta Horn, the Māori Trustee having renounced probate of the will. [45] The will is dated 15 May 1989 – that is, a month after the hearing that established the trust – and was prepared by the district solicitor of the Office of the Māori Trustee in Whangarei. Clauses 5(2) and (3) of...

4. CARROLL v Coroners Court at Auckland (2013 NZHC 906) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...the issue in relation to this ground of review is whether the Coroner’s finding that the applicants ought to have called the Police was one that a reasonable Coroner could have made. A finding will be unreasonable if it is not supported by any probative evidence, 7 or if “the reasoning by which the decision-maker justified inferences of fact that he had drawn is self-contradictory or otherwise based upon an evident logical fallacy”. 8 It is not enough for an applicant chal...

5. Tangi v ACC [2012] NZACA 4 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...in any replacement legislation, or in Campbell (supra) as to the nature of the evidence to be lead to satisfy the requirements of s 80(3). The issue is the relevance of the evidence given and the weight that should be given to it and relevant or probative evidence should not be excluded simply because it is not medical evidence. Condliffe v ACC (AP 274/02). [41] The Authority’s traditional approach to cases where the Corporation has wrongly destroyed a claim file that would othe...

6. [2020] NZREADT 34 - Hammond v Real Estate Agents Authority (11 August 2020) [pdf, 386 KB]

   ...submitted that the Tribunal should have the whole picture. [46] The Tribunal sought submissions on behalf of the Authority and Ms Tafilipepe. Mr Todd submitted on behalf of Ms Tafilipepe that the licensee’s supporting letter is hearsay, and has no probative value. He submitted that the email chain should not be admitted, as Ms Tafilipepe accepts that she told Mrs Hammond to send the Synergy report to the insurance broker, against the background that she was aware that Mrs Hammon...

7. Legal Complaints Review Officer v Hong [2013] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 224 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZLCDT 9 LCDT 025/12 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND IN THE MATTER of BOON GUNN HONG, Lawyer, of Auckland CHAIR Mr D Mackenzie MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms S Hughes QC Mr C Lucas Mr P Shaw Mr W Smith HEARING at Auckland on 21 February 2013 APPEARANCES Mr P Collins, for the Legal Complaints Review Officer Mr B Hong, Pra

8. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large December 2020 [xlsx, 278 KB]

   Contents People remanded on bail or at large, and offending while on bail or at large This includes information on: - people remanded on 'bail' (including 'EM bail') or 'at large' - offences committed while on 'bail' or 'at large' - people offending on 'bail' or 'at large' - people who failed to answer bail. Contents: Number of people on bail or at large Table 1: Number and percentage of people on bail or at l

9. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large June 2020 [xlsx, 279 KB]

   Contents People remanded on bail or at large, and offending while on bail or at large This includes information on: - people remanded on 'bail' (including 'EM bail') or 'at large' - offences committed while on 'bail' or 'at large' - people offending on 'bail' or 'at large' - people who failed to answer bail. Contents: Number of people on bail or at large Table 1: Number and percentage of people on bail or at l

10. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large December 2019 [xlsx, 280 KB]

    Contents People remanded on bail or at large, and offending while on bail or at large This includes information on: - people remanded on 'bail' (including 'EM bail') or 'at large' - offences committed while on 'bail' or 'at large' - people offending on 'bail' or 'at large' - people who failed to answer bail. Contents: Number of people on bail or at large Table 1: Number and percentage of people on bail or at l