993 items matching your search terms
GE.08-40566 (E) 010908 UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant on civil and political rights Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/NZL/5 18 February 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT Fifth periodic reports of States parties NEW ZEALAND∗ [24 December 2007] ∗ In accordance with the information transmitted to States
...Additionally, documentary evidence such as photographs, text messages, phone records, reports and other data provided what was often a useful and independent anchor of the oral evidence. I assessed each piece of evidence for reliability and its probative value in determining the issues before me. I put to one side evidence which I considered as inherently unlikely or, in some cases, as unreliable or untruthful. I have exercised particular caution where answers to critical events de...
...start of December and that observation makes sense only if Emma had already completed her first year at the salon. Other issues Emma included in her note which she wanted to query with Mr Harris were, the dates, the shop number, her title, breaks, probationary period, training, annual leave, public holidays on a Monday, who she reported to, her hours, her work days, her pay and redundancy provisions. [16] The only apparent change that had been made in the second employment agree...
...episodic drinking is a root cause of harm and costs borne by government, placing a significant burden on justice, health and social services. The harmful use of alcohol is estimated to cost the combined Justice sector (Police, courts, prison and probation service) $716.5 million (in 2005/06 dollar terms).i 5. The regulatory environment for the sale and supply of alcohol is a modifiable means of changing drinking behaviour and reducing alcohol-related harm, and is the focus of this RI...
SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE V DODD WN 2 July 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 84 WRC 52/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE Plaintiff AND CATHERINE ANNE DODD Defendant Hearing: 10-12 March 2010 (Heard at New Plymouth) Appearances: Alastair Sherriff and Deirdre Marshall, Counsel for Plaintiff Susan Hughes QC, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 2 July 2010
102 Taitokerau MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130008950 UNDER Section 26C, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application by Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited for reference of Māori fisheries dispute between Te Rūnanga Nui o Te Aupōuri and Ngāti Kuri, Ngāi Takoto and Te Rarawa - referred under s 182(4), Māori Fisheries Act 2004 BETWEEN TE OHU KAIMOANA TRUSTEE LIMITED Applicant AND
...became actively engaged in the two months leading up to the hearing. [34] We also note that even if we had exercised our discretion in favour of the evidence being allowed after judgment had been reserved, we consider that the evidence has little probative value in helping us decide on the charges. As we note later in our determination, it is not simply a matter of Ms Marshall’s knowledge of Mr Withers’ business affairs and involvement, and her own business experience, both...
RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED v THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 [31 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 112 EMPC 265/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC First Defendant AND E TU INC (FORMERLY THE SERVICE & FOOD WOR
...Greg may seriously injure or kill Maria. Maria is very reluctant to lay charges with Police as she is fearful of retribution from Greg if she does. However, Maria is on a community-based sentence and consents to Carmen sharing information with her Probation Officer, Sam, who is employed by the Department of Corrections. Maria, Carmen and Sam meet and discuss Maria’s risk of serious harm. At that meeting Maria reinforces that she does not consent to Police being involved. Followi...
...Greg may seriously injure or kill Maria. Maria is very reluctant to lay charges with Police as she is fearful of retribution from Greg if she does. However, Maria is on a community-based sentence and consents to Carmen sharing information with her Probation Officer, Sam, who is employed by the Department of Corrections. Maria, Carmen and Sam meet and discuss Maria’s risk of serious harm. At that meeting Maria reinforces that she does not consent to Police being involved. Followi...