Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpC 101 Ports of Auckland Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ [pdf, 14 KB]

   ...Employment Court at Auckland by 5 pm on 3 August 2010 written confirmation that MUNZ has complied with (b) above. (d) That orders (a) and (b) above are to continue until further order of the Court. (e) That pursuant to s 188 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 the plaintiff and defendant are directed to attend mediation or further mediation urgently and to comply with the directions given by the mediator appointed, for the purposes of facilitating such mediation. (f) That th...

2. PR1 - Application for brothel operator certificate [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...number: If you hold an order waiving a disqualification, state the number of the order made under section 37 of the Prostitution Reform Act 2003 and provide a copy of that order with this application: 4. Address of applicant to which certificate and any related correspondence is to be sent Number and street: Suburb: City: Postcode: 5. Telephone number and email address of applicant My daytime telephone number is: My email address is: Note: Compliance with this paragraph is optional....

3. [2013] NZEmpC 182 Hally Labels Ltd v Powell [pdf, 15 KB]

   ...for plaintiff Elliot Hudson and Wende Bennetti, counsel for defendant Judgment: 30 September 2013 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] This matter involves a challenge against a determination of the Employment Relations Authority dated 24 January 2013. 1 Subsequent to the determination there was a further costs determination of the Authority dated 28 February 2013. 2 That costs determination is not subject to any challenge. [2] The defendant...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 95 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...Drake, counsel for plaintiff D Erickson and M King, counsel for defendant Judgment: 13 June 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] This proceeding was removed to the Employment Court from the Employment Relations Authority (Authority) by way of special leave last year. 1 [2] There were four days of hearing in February 2014 but regrettably this proved to be inadequate and new dates, namely 16 and 17 June 2014, were allocated for the conclus...

5. ENVC Matiatia minute of the court 20141001 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...used, and bus linkages for the proposed new service. Also as to whether AT is aware of any other operators proposing ferry services to Waiheke. Ms McIndoe advised she would seek instructions as to whether a confidentiality order would be sought in relation to this direction and any information elicited in consequence of it. 3 [11] The final issue raised concerned draft conditions. I explained to lay patties that this was not in any wayan indication that consent would be forthcomin...

6. Burgess v CAC 20002 & Tremain and Tremain v CAC 20002 & Burgess [2013] NZREADT 59 [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...work to a garage and for the inspection of decks on the main dwelling so that he could remedy any structural defects which might render the deck unsafe. [3] We particularly note the settlement term that neither party shall make any statement in relation to these proceedings and their settlement. When the remedial work has been completed, both the appeals before us are to be withdrawn. [4] We have adjourned the appeals part-heard for two months from 9 July 2013 to enable implementa...

7. AY Ltd v ZB Ltd [2014] NZDT 676 (26 September 2014) [pdf, 16 KB]

   ...a satisfactory standard and able to be put together in a way that meets Building Code requirements. I find that it was of a satisfactory standard and that there was no breach of contract by ZB Limited. [10] I note further that although delays relating to consent issues were referred to by AY Limited and it was implied that ZB Limited was partly responsible for those delays, there was insufficient evidence on this point and in fact, it seems that another (third party) company was in...

8. Gay and Lesbian Clergy Anti-Discrimination Society Inc v Bishop of Auckland (Non-Party Access by TVNZ to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...Tribunal file must not hinder the Tribunal’s own access to the file. In the words of High Court Rules, r 3.16, access by TVNZ to the Tribunal file must not interfere with the orderly and fair administration of justice. [8] The second concern relates to the fact that there is an operative interim order prohibiting publication of the name and other details of the complainant as set out in the Minute dated 10 September 2012. In this regard it is noted that in her email dated 22 April...

9. Media release for annual suicide statistics for 2014/15 [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...issues, drug or alcohol abuse and economic hardship.” Judge Marshall said this information helped inform other agencies working in suicide research and prevention. Note: The information provided relates to provisional suicide figures and will slightly differ from the Ministry of Health figures. They include active cases before Coroners where intent has yet to be established therefore may eventually be found not to be suicides. In addition...

10. Director of Proceedings v Buist [2015] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 42 KB]

    ...defendant has breached the Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights) Regulations 1996 (“the Code”) in respect of the following Rights in the Code: (i) Right 4(1); (ii) Right 4(2). 3. In relation to the declaration being sought in paragraph 2(a) above, the parties respectfully refer to the agreed summary of facts. The parties are agreed that it is not necessary for the Tribunal to consider any other evidence for the purpose of ma...