Search Results

1. Ms B 14 April 2015 NZSHD 3 [pdf, 25 KB]

   ...holding a certificate if that person has been convicted of a ‘specified offence’ within the past five years. 2 [7] A ‘specified offence’ is defined in s.4 of the Act as an offence under sections 217 to 265 of the Crimes Act 1961 (which relate to crimes against rights of property), or an offence under the Fair Trading Act 1986. [8] Section 23 of the Act gives the Authority discretion to waive a disqualification from holding a certificate resulting from one or more of the...

2. RA Burgess 15 April 2014 NZSHD 6 [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...from holding a certificate if that person has been convicted of a ‘specified offence’ within the past five years. [9] A ‘specified offence’ is defined in s.4 of the Act as an offence under sections 217 to 265 of the Crimes Act 1961 (which relate to crimes against rights of property), or an offence under the Fair Trading Act 1986. 2 [10] Section 23 of the Act gives the Authority discretion to waive a disqualification from holding a certificate resulting from 1 or more of t...

3. Khalifeh and Manukau Scrap Metal and Cars Ltd 28 May 2014 NZSHD 8 [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...from holding a certificate if that person has been convicted of a ‘specified offence’ within the past five years. [8] A ‘specified offence’ is defined in s.4 of the Act as an offence under sections 217 to 265 of the Crimes Act 1961 (which relate to crimes against rights of property), or an offence under the Fair Trading Act 1986. [9] Section 23 of the Act gives the Authority discretion to waive a disqualification from holding a certificate resulting from 1 or more of the grou...

4. [2013] NZEmpC 138 Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education Ltd t/a Morningstar Preschool [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...counsel for plaintiff Paul Pa'u, advocate for defendant Judgment: 19 July 2013 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] The plaintiff in this matter was successful in a de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. 1 The judgment of this Court in favour of the plaintiff is dated 16 May 2013. 2 [2] The defendant has now filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal against this Court’s judgment. The plaintiff has consented to leave bei...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 106 Temara v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...and 18 June 2014 Appearances: D Goldwater, counsel for applicant S Cook and S McFetridge, counsel for respondent Judgment: 25 June 2014 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] Mr Temara commenced a claim in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) to pursue a personal grievance against the respondent. He claimed to have been unjustifiably dismissed. Following an investigation, a determination was issued on 14 April 2014 dismissing his claim. 1 C...

6. ENVC Matiatia party corresp RPMay15 memorandum of counsel [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...conditions accompany this memorandum. By reference to the EIC of Mr Dunn1 the linking or joining of the parking deck to the existing roadway will meet permitted activity standards. Accordingly no land use conditions are proposed. Conditions relating to marina traffic and review have been transferred into the Coastal permit conditions. 10. During the consultation phase directed by the Court, I will consult with counsel for Auckland Council concerning these draft consent condit...

7. ADF v ZWU Ltd [2013] NZDT 180 (19 June 2013) [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...event, the Tribunal’s jurisdiction in tort is limited to the destruction or loss of any property, or any damage or injury to any property (s 10(1)(c) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988). As this appears to be a claim for financial loss, not related to physical damage or loss of property, I consider that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in tort in respect of it. [6] I have considered the possibility of a claim under the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993. Assuming this legisla...

8. AAL and AAM v ZZQ in his capacity as Trustee of BG Trust [2012] NZDT 3 (7 August 2012) [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...Animals Law Reform Act 1989, and the law of negligence. In determining whether the Trust was negligent, the Tribunal must look at the standard of care expected of a reasonable farmer in the Trust’s position; the common practice in the locality in relation to fencing; the taking of other measures to prevent animals from straying onto highways in the locality, and any measures taken to warn users of the highway of the likely presence on animals on the highway. Findings [4]...

9. ENVC-34 notice of appeal general [docx, 14 KB]

   ...not* a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the Resource Management Act 1991. *Select one. *I am/am not† directly affected by an effect of the subject of the appeal that— (a) adversely affects the environment; and (b) does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. *Delete entire paragraph if you are not a trade competitor. †Select one. The decision (or part of the decision) that I am appealing is: [state a summary of the decision or par...

10. Millane 14 July 2014 NZSHD 10 [pdf, 22 KB]

    ...from holding a certificate if that person has been convicted of a ‘specified offence’ within the past five years. [6] A ‘specified offence’ is defined in s.4 of the Act as an offence under sections 217 to 265 of the Crimes Act 1961 (which relate to crimes against rights of property), or an offence under the Fair Trading Act 1986. [7] Section 23 of the Act gives the Authority discretion to waive a disqualification from holding a certificate resulting from 1 or more of the grou...