Search Results

1. GN v SM [2018] NZDT 1146 (7 May 2018) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...deemed to be an owner caused damage? c. If so, what damages are payable? Is Mr SM a “dog owner” for the purposes of the Dog Control Act 1996? [3] Under the Dog Control Act 1996, an owner of a dog is relevantly defined as follows: owner, in relation to any dog, means every person who— (a) owns the dog; or (b) has the dog in his or her possession, whether the dog is at large or in confinement, otherwise than for a period not exceeding 72 hours for the purpose of preventing the...

2. Dairy-NZ-Limited-100.pdf [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...low intensity farming). Dairy NZ is interested in this appeal point to ensure it remains consistent with the outcomes sought in Dairy NZ's appeal. Changes to Tables 3.11-1, 3.11-2, and 3.11-3 and a new Table 3-11.2(a) (to provide for the relative reduction in nitrogen, phosphorus and E.coli required as the whole of catchment scale). The Waikato and Waipa River Iwi also seek better connections between the policy direction, the Schedules, and the tables. While Dairy NZ supports t...

3. Dairy-NZ-Limited-94.pdf [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...appeal. Timeframes and progress toward water quality restoration and protection in Objective 1 and 2 Dairy NZ opposes as the relief sought is inconsistent with the outcomes sought in Dairy NZ's appeal. Clarifying that Policy 19 does not relate to biodiversity offsets or environmental compensation, because offsetting / compensation is inappropriate. Dairy NZ supports the need for clarity on the application of this policy, it is interested in this appeal point to ensure it...

4. Mercury NZ Limited 98.pdf [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...(RMA). 4 Mercury is interested in those issues that may affect its ability to operate, maintain, upgrade and develop its renewable electricity generation assets (in particular the Waikato Hydro System), including those parts of the proceedings related to the definition and use of the term “water bodies” and Table 3.11-2. Relief supported in part by Mercury 5 Mercury generally supports the Notice of Appeal’s clarification sought regarding the definition and use of the term...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 048 Hecko Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...consent authority whose abatement notice is appealed against; and (d) such other matters as the Judge thinks fit. [6] In the circumstances as they presently stand, I consider that the likely effect on the environment of granting a stay will be relatively minor and acceptable on a temporary basis. In such circumstances it would be unreasonable to require the appellant to comply with the abatement notice pending the outcome of its appeal and, in particular, the outcome of any media...

6. Trustees of Tarawera C9 - Tarawera C9 (2004) 175 Napier MB 212 (175 NA 212) [pdf, 586 KB]

   ...payment. there was a clear distinction made between the work the Trustee do on a daily basis for the office of Trustee. Attending meetings and hui and Trust business. The meeting fee is for payment for that work. This was distinctly different and more relating to the responsibility that the office of Trustee brings with it. " 12. Therefore he saw the payment as being an extra payment to the Trustees for the responsibility of being a Trustee and not for work carried out on Trust bus...

7. 7 August 2017 List week [pdf, 443 KB]

   ...evidence that will be produced to the Court at the hearing. 3. MAoRI LANGUAGE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS If any party or witness: 1. wishes to speak Maori at the hearing under the Maori Language Act 1987, or 2. has special needs (for example in relation to disability and access, deafness, difficulties with the English language), or 3. has any special arrangements for the hearing are required, e.g. transport for site visits, storage space for bulky exhibits, video playback they are t...

8. I. Singh v Kumar [2016] NZIACDT 45 (6 September 2016) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...Mr Kumar faced very serious allegations that the Registrar and the complainant did not pursue, it would be appropriate to take no further action. While it may be appropriate to view the three complaints as a whole, it is not necessary to do so in relation to this complaint. The Registrar accepted Mr Kumar made an inadvertent error, and faced grave allegations for which there is no support; the proper outcome is to take no further action. Determination and Orders [13] Having upheld the...

9. Man O'War 212 [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...subdivision that are sought to be reinstated under the appeal are supported by Man 0' War Farm as better achieving the purposes of RMA, and more appropriately (efficiently and effectively) achieving the objectives of the Unitary Plan in relation to rural land resources and subdivision, including for incentivising restoration of degraded landscapes, and protection of resources of significant ecological value which are not (or not as yet) mapped as Significant Ecological Areas...

10. Man O'War 219 [pdf, 317 KB]

    ...subdivision that are sought to be reinstated under the appeal are supported by Man 0' War Farm as better achieving the purposes of RMA, and more appropriately (efficiently and effectively) achieving the objectives of the Unitary Plan in relation to rural land resources and subdivision, including for incentivising restoration of degraded landscapes, and protection of resources of significant ecological value which are not (or not as yet) mapped as Significant Ecological Areas...