Search Results

1. Duty Lawyer Policy v2.15.pdf [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. Published by the Ministry of Justice 2012 © Crown Copyright Ministry of Justice The...

2. Consultation on a new Adjudication Act for New Zealand [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Adjudication Act for New Zealand Proposal 1 This paper seeks agreement to release a consultation document proposing a new out of court Adjudication Act. The Act will provide more choice for businesses to resolve civil disputes quickly and privately. Relation to government priorities 2 This proposal will contribute to the Government’s priorities f effic ent justice and improving court timeliness. It aligns with the Government s goals in the Budget 2025 policy statement to build a...

3. 210-Application-for-eviction-warrant-v2-2.pdf [pdf, 430 KB]

   ...www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ 0800 233 222 PAGE 5 OF 12 Application for for eviction warrant Section A Information required to process your application You must complete all the steps in this section. 1. Provide the court reference number this application relates to For example, CIV-2013-095-123 Court reference number You must attach a copy of the judgment or court order if you have not already given the court a copy. I have attached a copy I have already given the...

4. Duty Lawyer Policy v-2.16.pdf [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. Published by the Ministry of Justice 2012 © Crown Copyright Ministry of Justice The Jus...

5. 10.4 Appendix D: Environment Court In-Court Media Coverage Guidelines 2011

   ...word or expression used is not defined in these guidelines but is defined in the District Court Rules or the High Court Rules, it has the meaning given to it in those rules, unless the context otherwise requires. Discretion of the court All matters relating to in-court media coverage are at the discretion of the court. Guidelines 5 to 15 apply subject to subclause (1). Electronic communication This guideline applies to any electronic communication of information from inside the hearing venue t...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. Media Centre >
   4. Media information >
   5. Media guide for reporting the courts and tribunals: Edition 4.1 >
   6. 10.0 Appendices

6. Fox-Warren v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment injury/Revocation of Cover) [2025] NZACC 116 (16 July 2025) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...of probabilities, the vertical root fracture was caused by normal chewing forces on the severely structurally compromised tooth. … The root fracture and the need to extract tooth 17 appears to be required as a direct result of a non-treatment related root fracture. … The damage noted on tooth 17 was not a result of the treatment provided in February 2022. While a vertical root fracture is not an ordinary consequence of root canal treatment on a tooth that is structurally compro...

7. National Standards Committee 2 v Mulligan [2025] NZLCDT 32 (1 July 2025) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...practitioner, until further order of the High Court or the expiry of the appeal period for the penalty decision. It is noted that if the liability appeal is not pursued then it is agreed that suppression can lapse. The permanent orders, made earlier, and relating to victims’ identities, remain in force. Orders 1. Mr Mulligan is suspended from practice as a barrister and solicitor for a period of 15 months commencing 4 July 2025. (pursuant to ss 242(1)(e) and 244 of the LCA) 2...

8. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Ellis [2018] NZLCDT 24 [pdf, 558 KB]

   ...applicant argues that Ms B’s email of 5 July 2011 effectively terminated the retainer. [26] The respondent argues that the retainer did not terminate until March 2016. His assertion is that he had a residual continuing retainer as a fiduciary in relation to dividends received by his practice. 3 NoE p 37, line 6. 7 [27] We have found that it is unnecessary to make findings on the two areas of disputed facts for the reaso...

9. HI v UT [2025] NZDT 211 (5 May 2025) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...to be added, as well as delivery and installation. However, this would not include the decorative colour detail which the original wardrobes had. HI says he believes these units are not available in any event. vi. UT says the storage unit is a relatively lightweight unit, with panels of around 6-8mm not the 18mm the [joinery company] quote includes. That quote also refers to a mirror, which the original does not have. vii. It is unclear how old the original wardrobe unit was, but i...

10. Implementation and Follow up

    ...invite subject-matter agencies to participate. Lead agencies are encouraged to share public feedback received with relevant agencies.  Agencies may also need to proactively engage with other stakeholders who may not be aware that recommendations relate to them, for example local government or the courts. Existing monitoring groups, such as the Independent Monitoring Mechanism under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities or the Children’s Monitoring Group...

    Located in:

    1. Justice sector & policy >
    2. Constitutional issues & human rights >
    3. Human rights >
    4. International human rights >
    5. International Human Rights Guidelines