[2011] NZEmpC 52 C v Air New Zealand [pdf, 87 KB]
...plaintiff’s challenge succeeding, the Authority’s determination on costs be set aside and replaced with an order of the Court. That, in any event, is the effect of s 183 of the Act as I have mentioned. Part of the costs before the Authority related to the plaintiff’s interlocutory application for interim reinstatement. The plaintiff was unsuccessful and eventually did not challenge that determination. It is reasonable therefore that the plaintiff makes a contribution to the...