Search Results

1. [2015] NZSSAA 83 (13 November 2015) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...Committee upheld the decision of the Chief Executive. The appellant then appealed to this Authority. [8] Before the Authority, the appellant’s primary position was that he had been treated unfairly by people at the Mangere Reception Centre in relation to his application for social housing in 2012. The appellant said that all of the other refugees at the Reception Centre at the same time were allocated social housing. From his inquiries he now firmly believes that all refugees are en...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 037 Ngai Tamahaua Hapu Committee v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 782 KB]

   ...Committee were never consulted or notified of the commencement of the enabling works and there is utility in hearing the appeals to resolve ongoing matters, especially those resulting from the finding of koiwi. They submit that the timing issues in relation to the projects have been brought on the Council by its own actions. Conversely, they submit that the Hapu Committee will be unduly prejudiced if the waivers are not granted. [18] The authorities as granted include conditions r...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 196 KAQ v The Attorney-General [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...• A number of documents on the Court file contain sensitive personal information about the parties and others. • The documentation contains reference to a number of serious allegations which have yet to be tested. • A number of documents relate to a trial management matter and are not of direct relevance to the matters of issue in the proceedings. • Access to some of the documents would not be appropriate as they deal with matters to be dealt with in another forum and ma...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 163 LDJ v EZC Costs [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...a reasonable disbursement. I accept that it is payable. That sum is inclusive of GST as LDJ is not GST registered. [19] I accept, as submitted by counsel for the respondent, that the filing fee for the statement of problem in the Authority relates to the substance of the parties’ dispute. However, it was necessary for LDJ to file the statement of problem in the Authority before any removal application could be filed. Accordingly, I find that it was a cost that was specific t...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 147 MW v Spiga Ltd [pdf, 740 KB]

   ...Table of Contents The plaintiff challenges the Authority’s decision declining non-publication [1] The parties and their problem [7] Two issues arise [11] Case law to date [13] The powers of the Authority and the Court Particular provisions relating to the Employment Relations Authority Particular provisions relating to the Employment Court [22] [26] [28] Open justice is fundamental [36] The broader context [47] The relevance of privacy interests [56] The role of tikanga [6...

6. Advantage Realty Limited v CAC303 & Ors / Gambino & Anor v CAC303 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 83 [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...The licensee must ask for your consent, using this form, if any of the following people want to acquire an interest in your land* or business: (a) an agent†, branch manager, or salesperson (licensee) who is working for you; or (b) a person related to that licensee (related person‡). *Note that land is defined in section 4 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 to include a number of different types of property and interests in property— including, for example, your house. †No...

7. Sell v Harris [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...Respondent in contract .............................................105 Claim in Tort.............................................................................................107 LIABILITY OF AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL – SECOND RESPONDENT..109 Claim in relation to Building Consent process..........................................112 The Inspection Process ...........................................................................116 LIABILITY OF KEVIN TRIBE – THIRD RESPONDENT.............

8. [2020] NZEmpC 139 KiwiRail Ltd v Mobbs [pdf, 450 KB]

   ...1 Mobbs v KiwiRail Ltd [2019] NZERA 354 (Member Campbell) The applicable CEAs [8] It is common ground that when Mr Mobbs applied for retirement leave in 2018, the applicable CEA was between KiwiRail and MUNZ 2016 – 2018. It related to employees of KiwiRail who worked on the Interislander ferries. The agreement covered work performed by permanent, fixed-term and casual employees in various positions on the Kaiarahi, Aratere, Kaitaki, and any new ships which may b...

9. IJ v BLV [2014] NZIACDT 38 (25 March 2014) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...it does, whether the adviser acted properly. [7] The Tribunal has found the placement at a motel and the employment issues are not matters it can deal with, as they do not concern immigration. The Tribunal has found the adviser acted properly in relation to his duties as a licensed immigration adviser. Procedural history [8] On 3 February 2014, the Registrar filed a Statement of Complaint; it explained the Registrar had undertaken further investigation and is not able to present inform...

10. TC & AK v BH & TH [2021] NZDT 1306 (25 March 2021) [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...The Tribunal orders: BH, TH and LD as trustees of the ABC Trust are to pay TC and AK $17,336.99 on or before Thursday 15 April 2021. Reasons: 1. TC and AK entered a share milking contract with the trustees of the ABC Trust (Trustees). The relationship deteriorated and the Trustees terminated the contract. Upon termination, the final milk contract payment was made to the Trustees in place of TC and AK. TC and AK seek reimbursement for the final milk contract payment. The Truste...