Search Results

1. FSSI Ministerial Exemption [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...relevant to being a reporting entity under the Act. d. Where a non-member is any person, company, trust or any other entity not an active shareholding member in the cooperative, including but not limited to ex-members, staff, ex-staff, limited “related parties” of the aforementioned (related to members, ex-members, and current staff), and other “depositors” (ex-staff and people related to ex-staff). e. FSSI must inform the Ministry of Justice of any changes that may affect the e...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 126 EBIIWU v Norske Skog Tasman Ltd [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...plaintiff pursued a successful challenge 1 against a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. Costs were reserved. The parties have been unable to agree costs and accordingly the matter has come back before the Court. [2] The proceedings related to a dispute about the interpretation and application of provisions in a collective agreement between the parties relating to holiday pay. The Authority dismissed the plaintiff’s claim, for reasons set out in its determinatio...

3. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui Rotorua 29 April 2018 [pdf, 433 KB]

   Page 1 of 4 TE ARA WHAKAMUA Ā TĀTOU -OUR PATH AHEAD CROWN/MĀORI RELATIONS HUI NOTES Date of hui: 29 April 2018 Venue: Te Papaiouru Marae, Rotorua Attendees: Approx. 85 hui participants Hon Kelvin Davis, Minister for Crown/Māori Relations Tamati Coffey MP Deborah Mahuta-Coyle, Senior Ministerial Advisor to Hon Davis Te Rau Kupenga, Crown Facilitator Officials from: • Crown/Māori Relations Roopu (Te Tāhū o te Ture - Ministry of Justice); and • Te P...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 186 Al-Bustanji v Corrections Association of New Zealand Inc [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...applicants say that the respondent’s counterclaim is not appropriate to the nature of the proceeding. [8] Where a counterclaim is filed, the Court is guided by the processes set out in rr 5.53–5.61 of the High Court Rules.4 Rule 5.53, which relates to a counterclaim which is filed against a plaintiff only, states: A defendant who intends to raise a counterclaim against the plaintiff only must file a statement of counterclaim in the registry of the court in which the stateme...

5. Biddle v Karaitiana - Waipahihi 4H Block (2017) 163 Waiariki MB 149 (163 WAR 149) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...what the “debt, demand and damage” relates to. Therefore the Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to s 18(1)(d) of the Act. [9] I also note that Mr Tupara has included submissions regarding s 18(2). In fact his submissions relating to s 18(2) are far more detailed and extensive than those in relation to 18(1)(d). That section provides that any proceedings commenced in the Māori Land Court may, if the Judge thinks fit, be removed for hearing into any other Court...

6. [2016] NZSSAA 005 (16 February 2016) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...Cancel of level of alternative medical treatment ‘reason given’. 2 [2] The appeal was lodged in relation to a decision of a Benefits Review Committee dated 22 August 2014 about a decision of the Chief Executive of May 2014. That decision related to the assessment of the Disability Allowance payable to the appellant and his wife. It appears that at that Benefits Review Committee hearing the appellant and his wife also raised issues about the difficulties they were experiencing makin...

7. [2024] NZEmpC 31 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 206 KB]

   ALLAN GEOFFREY HALSE v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2024] NZEmpC 31 [28 February 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 31 EMPC 425/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for extension of time to file submissions on costs AND IN THE MATT...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 169 Kim v Thermosash Commercial Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

   WILSON KIM V THERMOSASH COMMERCIAL LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 169 [14 December 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 169 ARC 54/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out the claim BETWEEN WILSON KIM Plaintiff AND THERMOSASH COMMERCIAL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18 November 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Plaintiff...

9. Kotahitanga Log Haulage Limited v Forest Distribution Limited - Mangaroa (2015) 121 Waiariki MB 149 (121 WAR 149) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...performance of lessee’s obligations contained in the employment clause. Whilst the claim against FDL is a simple claim for breach of contact the contract was granted in part-performance of the lessee’s obligations and is therefore directly related to Māori freehold land. [15] The second head of claim was specific performance against PF Olsen and Mr Bidois submits: 11.2 A claim for specific performance against PF Olsen. This claim is brought against PF Olsen as agent for OT...

10. Ram v Tan [2017] NZIACDT 18 (26 September 2017) [pdf, 243 KB]

    ...funds (critical for his client’s immigration status), lodged a non-compliant application and failed to notify his client of the issues promptly or properly. [3.3] There was a complete failure to complete the client engagement process, and it related to a substantial instruction involving a fee of $10,000. The transmission of funds related to a critical element of compliance for a Long-term Business Visa. Accordingly, the effect of not providing proper guidance and advice was...