Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 056 Waikanae Land Company Limited v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 397 KB]

   ...ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA IN THE MA TIER Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 056 of an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 and an application under s 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WAIKANAE LAND COMP ANY LIMITED AND AND AND Court: Hearing: Last case event: Appearances: (ENV-2021-WLG-000034) (ENV-2022-WLG-000014) Appellant/ Applicant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE...

2. Taipana - Āorangi Part Taonui Āhuatūranga Block 3A2 (2024) 486 Aotea MB 169-185 (486 AOT 169-185) [pdf, 688 KB]

   ...Period. A Code of Compliance Certificate for any occupied building on the Site must be provided to the Court prior to the expiry of the Construction Period, and to the Landowner(s) if requested. (b) The Occupier shall obtain all required building and resource consents from the Council for any buildings that are located on the site. These must be provided to the Landowner(s) if requested. (c) The Occupier shall ensure that, should any application for resource consent require identify...

3. OIA-109743.pdf [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...to access court documents and those filed by other parties; providing them with a single trusted source of information about their case 10.2. Logistics management – supporting the right things to occur at the right time, including allocating resources in the most effective way. 10.3. Content management – supporting the use, management, and access to court information/files 10.4. Procedure management – supporting the application of the procedural process, including judicial de...

4. 2023-08-18-Submissions-of-Alan-Jamieson.pdf [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...Appendix E – Discussion about the shared path by some partners to Ō2NL. E-1 Expert Evidence 04 - Muaūpoko Tribal Authority - … access to raupō restoration area from the shared use path in the wai karito tributary … harvesting of Māori resources from the shared use pathway such as harakeke and raupō … Use of tree forts as a mahi toi design parameter alongside the shared-use path … E-2 Expert Evidence 11 - Ngāti Wehi Wehi - … integrate these sites of historical and c...

5. MacDonald v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 202 (9 December 2024) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...delivered must stand for better or worse, subject, of course, to appeal. Were it otherwise, there would be great inconvenience and uncertainty. [27] These cases therefore set the threshold for recall at a high level. Understandably so. Judicial resources are finite, and the standard remedies of appeal and judicial review are available. [28] At any given time, there are approximately 200 ACC appeals awaiting hearing. [29] And in order that the fundamental underlying ethos of the...

6. [2025] NZEmpC 212 Kamo Landscape & Quarry Supplies Limited v Caswell [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...on third parties; 3 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 180. 4 Duncan v Osborne Building Ltd (1992) 6 PRNZ 85 (CA) at 87. 5 Employment Court Regulations 2000, reg 64. 6 Grove v Archibald [1998] 2 ERNZ 125 (EmpC) at 128–129. 7 Bathurst Resources Ltd v L&M Coal Holdings Ltd [2020] NZCA 186, (2020) 25 PRNZ 341 at [19]. 8 Assured Financial Peace Ltd v Pais [2010] NZEmpC 50 at [5]; and Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bilgola Enterprises Ltd (1999) 13 PRNZ 48 (CA)....

7. [2010] NZEmpC 80 Willis v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...found that the plaintiff had been issued a verbal permit to perform the silo agitator checks. [9] On Monday 11 February 2007 Mr Purser, having received Mr Clement’s written report dated 8 February, contacted Alisa Ravji, an Human Resources Advisor at the Fonterra site, and she advised him on the investigation process he needed to follow. That same day Mr Purser said he spoke to the plaintiff and told him about Mr Clement’s written statement and the allegation that t...

8. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 (2011) 38 Waiariki MB 218 (38 WAR 218) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...investigatory licence with Trust Power”. 13 In approving the variation, Judge Hingston made the following statements: 14 Court: I have no problem in varying the Trust Order to allow trustees to negotiate a proposal that would exploit the geothermal resource to the advantage of owners; my view is that any proposals providing for owner/trustee participation in the development of power stations and sale of electricity must ensure that the developer company even though owners are p...

9. Peni v Pahi — Tiroa E Block and Te Hape B Block (2010) 1 Waikato Maniapoto MB 25 (1 WMN 25) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...the then trustees of Tiroa E and Te Hape B on 26 January 2005. There was a transfer to the Scott Family Trust on 3 January 2007. A caveat by Mr Stanley was registered on 16 March 2007. On 27 May 2008 a consent notice pursuant to s 221 of the Resource Management Act 1991 was registered on the withdrawal of Mr Stanley’s caveat. Simultaneously titles were issued for Lot 1 DP 396746 and Lot 2-3 DP 396746. The transfer of Lot 1 to Mr Stanley was also registered at the same time....

10. 2020-02-19 Richard Allibone Reply [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...alter or detract from the opinions that I express. Scope of Rebuttal evidence 4 In my evidence in reply I provide a response on a topic basis. The evidence I have responded to is: (a) Evidence in Chief of Susan McKeague for the Otago Water Resources Users Group (OWRUG) dated 4 February 2021; (b) Evidence in Chief of Dr Nicholas Dunn for the Department of Conservation dated 5 February 2021; (c) Evidence in Chief of Dr John Hayes for Fish & Game, Otago and Central South...