Staite v Greenville - Paeroa East 4B2C2 (2002) 264 Rotorua MB 132 (264 ROT 132) [pdf, 711 KB]
...take matters into his own hands and to build a bridge on his own land, the new bridge. It was claimed by the respondents, that the work on the bridge by Staite, constituted the replacement of the old bridge and therefore consent pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 C'RMA"), was required. In fact Staite had dealt extensively with the Waikato Valley Authority, which had conceded rightly or wrongly that consent was not needed. He therefore had the ability to proceed....