9129 items matching your search terms
BI-309448-3-733-V1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2016-CHC-47 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent SUPPLEMENTARY BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF DR STEPHEN GORDON CHILES – BACKGROUND NOISE MONITORING REPORT ____________________________________________________________...
...been declined and the hearing was proceeding. [25] As noted in the Minute at [11] as set out above, it is the norm for litigants to be self- represented at the Tribunal and Tribunal procedure accommodates this. The Tribunal currently has limited resources which have led to unacceptable delays in allocating fixtures for telephone conferences, hearings and in the issuing of decisions. See, Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Delay) [2017] NZHRRT 8. Given the resource pressures in the Tr...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN Decision No. [20181 NZEnvC 52 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application pursuant to s 149T of the Act QUEENSTOWN AIRPORT CORPORATION LIMITED (ENV-2011-WLG-41 ) Applicant Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Environment Commissioner D J Bunting Hearing : at Christchurch on 4 and 5 April 2018 Appearances: M Casey and C Somerville-...
...came to an end when AJ died. [16] Ms JJ submitted that: (a) [Law Firm A] had wrongfully failed to notify her of the existence of the EPA in 2010. (b) That had deprived her of the chance to exercise it by using AJ’s property to meet from his resources the extra care expenses met at the time by LJ. (c) That had also led to the expenditure involved in other (the PPPR) court proceedings. (d) The failure had involved a breach of a duty [Law Firm A] owed to AJ. The Committee dec...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 107 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s174 of the Act BETWEEN D M HANDLEY (ENV-2017 -WLG-96) Appellant AND SOUTH TARANAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent/Requiring Authority Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 10 July 2018 Date of Issue: 10 July 2...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 172 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act J BOYD, J F A & S J REDAi & ORS (ENV-2018-CHC-163) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner M C G Mabin Hearing: In Chambe...
[BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Court: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC Oq <0 of an appeal pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of Directions under s 293 of the Act PETER JOHN FINDLAY and DONNA MARGARET FINDLAY (ENV-2014-AKL-000119) Appellants WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL and NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY S 274 Parti...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [20181 NZEnvC 162 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN H P DOIG (ENV-2017-CHC-053) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 31 August 2018 Date of Issue: 31 August 2018 DECISION AS TO COSTS A: The application for costs b...
...approach, compared to taking no action Government The anticipated cost to Government is low, agencies that will be affected are: Police The proposed new offences could lead to an uptake in reporting, which would lead to higher use of Police resourcing Corrections Little to no impact on the prison population is expected. Crown Law It is unclear how many new prosecutions may be initiated, nor how many of those defendants will elect trial by jury, however an uptake in pr...
...1 Evidence of TQ at review hearing. The company was represented by a lawyer in an employment dispute involving allegations of theft against Mr WA. The company subsequently retained the services of XX Services (XX), a human resources consultancy firm. 2 [4] Ms FW is Ms RT’s lawyer in family matters concerning her two children with Mr TQ (the children). [5] Ms FW also acts for Mr WA in an employment dispute that involves Mr TQ. [6] Mr TQ says that M