Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 100 Coastal Ratepayers United Inc v Kapiti Coast District Council [pdf, 519 KB]

   iBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 100 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for a declaration under s 311 of the Act COASTAL RATEPAYERS UNITED INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-WLG-000028) Applicant KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge B P Dwyer Heard: At Wellington on 23 November 2016 Interim decision: 3 March 2017 Date of Decision: 7 July 2017 Date of Issue: 7 July 2017...

2. 2021-03-15 Trustpower 1- Extract from s 32 Evaluation of Proposed NPS FM 2020 dated 22 July 2020 [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...Objective for the reasons discussed above 7.4 POLICY 4 Policy 4 Fresh water is managed as part of New Zealand’s integrated response to climate change. Supported by: Part 3 Subpart 2 National Objectives Framework 3.14 Setting limits on resource use 3.16 Setting environmental flows and levels 3.31 Large hydro-electric generation schemes 7.4.1 INTENT Policy 4 is a new policy and is the only policy relating to climate change in the NPS-FM 2020. It has been included as pa...

3. [2017] NZEnvC 065 Auckland Council v Waiwera Heights Country Club Limited [pdf, 186 KB]

   jBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 0(;15 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application pursuant to s 316 of the Act AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2015-AKL-000102) Applicant WAIWERA HEIGHTS COUNTRY CLUB LIMITED Respondent Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Hearing: Judicial Telephone Conference held 4 May 2017 Appearances: B Watts for Auckland Council S Brownhill for Waiwera Heights Country Club Limited Date of...

4. Pukekohe Vegetable Growers Association v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 193 KB]

   1 | P a g e BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO I TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN Pukekohe Vegetable Growers Association Appellant AND Waikato Regional Council Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL – PUKEKOHE VEGETABLE GROWERS ASSOCIATION 2 TO: The Registrar Enviro...

5. Proactive release – District Court (District Court Judges) Amendment Bill: Approval for Introduction [pdf, 953 KB]

   ...Ministries of Social Development, Health 3 Youth Court Judges are also District Court Judges. The Youth Court is also division of the District Court. Additional Youth Court Judges are needed because the rehabilitative focus of the Youth Court is more resource intensive than the adult court processes. auye8nfjli 2019-06-04 14:29:46 RE LE AS ED B Y TH E M IN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E RE LE AS ED B Y TH E M IN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E RE LE AS ED B Y TH E M...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 127 Byrne v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...impecunious, she suffered significant financial hardship because of the alleged breach of the settlement agreement. It asserts that NZTA would not be affected injuriously by a stay, as the amount of $7,500 is negligible in terms of its size and resources. The application states Ms Byrne’s challenge is being prosecuted in good faith and for good reason. [8] The application was supported by an affidavit from Ms Byrne, explaining her financial circumstances. She confirms she is n...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 095 Auckland Council v Waiwera Heights Country Club Limited [pdf, 513 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MA TIER OF BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 09 ~ an application to change an enforcement order under s 321 of the Resource Management Act 1991 AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2021-AKL-000024) Applicant WAIWERA HEIGHTS COUNTRY CLUB LIMITED Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Hearing: Last case event: On the papers in chambers in Auckland 28 May 2021 Date of Decisio...

8. [2020] NZSSAA 17 (7 October 2020) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...when making a payment under the programme. These principles require the Ministry to consider whether a payment would best meet the particular immediate need of the applicant, the applicant’s ability to meet that need from the applicant’s own resources, the assistance that might be available from other sources, the existing debt level, the effect on the applicant if the need is not met and the effect on any other persons in the applicant’s family. The Ministry may also consid...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 98 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...respond to, with different considerations arising in respect of each. [16] Finally, it was argued that there was no real prejudice to the defendants if costs were not resolved at this stage. It was submitted Inland Revenue is a large and well- resourced government department, so that any delay in being paid what to them would 4 Dwyer v Air New Zealand Ltd [1997] ERNZ 156 (EmpC) at 157. 5 At p 157; a more recent confirmation of stay factors is set out in New Zealand Cards Ltd v R...

10. [2021] NZEnvC 119 Wellington City Council v Thor Group Limited [pdf, 4 MB]

    I (~f -~ \'t:: ' IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA IN THE MATIER OF Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 119 an application under s 316 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL (ENV-2021-WLG-000010) Applicant AND Court: Hearing: Last case event: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: THOR GROUP LIMITED First Respondent SURYA KUMAR Second Respondent REUBEN A VEN...