FM & PM v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 134 (30 May 2023) [pdf, 191 KB]
...$15,000.00 deposit on the basis that the two contracts were interdependent and therefore, both deposits ought to be refunded. Furthermore, the applicants claim they were misled and did not understand that the build deposit was to be used to progress the resource consent (eg engineers, draughting). 7. The issues to be determined are (a) Is the Sale and Purchase Agreement for the sale of the land with QF Ltd and the Building Contract with the respondent for the house, interdepende...