9019 items matching your search terms
...Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) and: in the matter of: Proposed Plan Hearing Topics 006 RPS Natural Resources and 035 Air Quality between: Waste Management NZ Limited Appellant and: Auckland Council Respondent 1 100053497/5167848 To The Registrar Environment Court Auckland Introduction 1 New Zealand Steel Limited (...
...Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) and: in the matter of: Proposed Plan Hearing Topics 006 RPS Natural Resources and 035 Air Quality between: New Zealand Starch Limited Appellant and: Auckland Council Respondent 1 100053497/5167945 To The Registrar Environment Court Auckland Introduction 1 New Zealand Steel Limited (...
...Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) and: in the matter of: Proposed Plan Hearing Topics 006 RPS Natural Resources and 035 Air Quality between: ACI Operations New Zealand Limited, trading as O-I New Zealand Appellant and: Auckland Council Respondent 1 100053497/5166690 To The Registrar Environment Court Auckland Introdu...
BALMORAL DEVELOPMENTS LTD & ORS v DCC – 2GP – ERRATUM IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 60 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the proposed Second-Generation Dunedin City District Plan BETWEEN BALMORAL DEVELOPMENTS (OUTRAM) LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-265) AND BLUE GRASS LIMITED, SADDLE VIEWS ESTATE LIMIT...
...Likewise, if the CCRC receives a large number of applications that do not have viable prospects of success, its efficiency in dealing with meritorious cases could be diminished. The main method of mitigating this risk will be to ensure that adequate resource and powers are provided to the CCRC. For example, providing the CCRC with the powers to compel information from public and private bodies will be another mechanism that protects against unnecessary delay. Impact Stateme...
...AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Dairy Flat 0792 jimdavies@xtra.co.nz Mob 0274 943143 LEB-423066-11-174-V1:j d ENV -2016-AKL- of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal under section 156(1) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Aucklan...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATIER OF Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 52 appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAIZI NUI-A RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2019-WLG-000018) JOHN BENT (ENV-2019-WLG-000019) Appellants :MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Environment Judge BP Dwyer...
...Annual Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law, Oslo, June 2016 BY PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENT JUDGE LAURIE NEWHOOK (NZ) Role of the New Zealand Environment Court [1] The New Zealand Environment Court is currently established under the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”), and is a Court of Record. It is the successor to bodies established under earlier legislation, and can trace its origins to the early 1950s. The Court operates as an integrated part of the whole...
...rezoning would be inconsistent with the proposed rural objectives, which seek to protect high class soils, avoid all urban subdivision, use and development within the rural environment and maintain or enhance the productive versatility of rural resources and maintain rural character and amenity;4 (e) The proposed rezoning would be inconsistent with the development principles in the WRPS, for the following reasons: (i) The Submission Area is identified in Future Proof 2017 as a ...
Karmarkar v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 253 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s 325 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN MADHAV KARMARKAR AND JAYASHREE LIMITED (ENV-2024-AKL-115) Appellants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick Environment Commissioner S Myers Environment Commissioner G Paine Hearing:...