Search Results

1. Tranche-4-of-Cabinet-and-Ministerial-advice-on-changes-to-clubs-and-ranges-regulations.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...reasonably static and there are unl ikely to be many new clubs applying for enrolment during this period. Non-pistol shooting range enrolment 23. Processing enrolment applications for non-pistol shooting ranges involves a greater level of regulator resource than enrolment applications for non-pistol shooting clubs and we consider a level of cost recovery is appropriate. 24. We propose that fees for the enrolment of non-pistol shooting ranges should be the same as the current certifica...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 127 Hutton and Others v Provenco Cadmus Ltd (in receivership) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...Court would deal with the claims of only six of the 112 plaintiffs and would be in the nature of a test case. The intention was that the Court’s judgment in the test case now before the Court would achieve savings in Court time and judicial resources and may lead to the parties being able to settle the remaining 106 claims or at least isolate and narrow the issues. Counsel agreed at the directions conference that it would be appropriate to allocate a five day fixture although it...

3. [2008] NZEmpC AC 35/08 Webb v New Zealand Tramways and Public Passengers Transport Union Inc [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...that a headnote summary of the determinations prepared by the Authority for publication on the Department of Labour’s website would be a better way of informing interested union members. Such summaries are, however, prepared for legal and human resources practitioners and tend to emphasise the legal outcomes and the Authority’s reasoning. There are other parts of the Authority’s determinations that should be available to members so that, put succinctly, more may be...

4. [2009] NZEmpC AC 12/09 Service and Food Workers Union Inc & Anor v Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...Appeal for 1½ days with the matter still not being resolved. Very significant legal costs have been incurred. Mr Cranney invited me to conclude that it will be unreasonable to organise the litigation in a manner that will incur further costs and resources to address very substantial factual and legal issues unnecessarily. Counsel submitted that there is no material disadvantage to Spotless by the making of these directions. [15] In opposing severance of issues for preliminary tr...

5. [2009] NZEmpC CC 18/09 Grey v Director-General of Conservation [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...solicitor and as solicitor on the record in proceedings against the Attorney-General. [4] The first documents that Ms Grey asks to be disclosed are “All advice, file notes etc recording communications between the Director-General, and his human resources team…”. Counsel for the defendant assures the Court that there are no such documents other than those which have already been disclosed to the plaintiff. Such an assurance from counsel is usually determinative of a matter su...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 212 Go Bus Transport Ltd v Hellyer interlocutory [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...on the challenge. The minute was to be served on those parties as well as counsel for Go Bus. Chief Judge Colgan will preside over a directions conference on these matters on 7 December 2015. Evidence and submissions of Go Bus [13] The Human Resources Manager of Go Bus, Mr Bardsley, filed an affidavit in support of the company’s application for stay. He deposed that Go Bus is in a financial position to pay the sum ordered by the Authority to Mr Hellyer; and that it would be p...

7. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - list of issues 6th report [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...to disseminate the Covenant among judges, lawyers and prosecutors. 2. Please provide information on significant political and administrative measures taken since the previous report to promote and protect human rights under the Covenant, and the resources allocated thereto, their means, objectives and results. 3. Please provide any other information on new measures taken to disseminate and implement the previous recommendations of the Committee (CCPR/C/NZL/CO/5), including any necessa...

8. Horan - Hiwarau C (2015) 118 Waiariki MB 25 (118 WAR 25) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...valuer’s opinion that the partition would not affect the residual value of Hiwarau C, apart from the removal value and that the Pukepuke whānau would not get anything more than was originally amalgamated into Hiwarau C. … [16] I note that a resource consent report was also obtained from the Opotiki District Council Environment and Planning Manger. That report recommends consent be given subject to a Māori Land Court partition order being made and other requirements as to sub...

9. Webster - Komakorau Parish of 146B1A (Hukanui Marae) (2012) 42 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (42 WMN 83) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...notice to all parties who had an interest in the issue to be discussed by the meeting; d) NZTA is to sign an agreement with Te Kauhanganui Incorporated (“TKI”) in respect of NZTA’s statutory obligations of consultation, pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Land Transport Management Act 2003 relating to the Waikato Expressway which is to be built by NZTA. [2] The applicant also alleged that the rules of natural justice were breached because, amongst other th...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 222 Selwyn Foundation v Nayathodan re-issued [pdf, 81 KB]

    ...challenge to the Authority’s substantive determination. It says that it is required to lodge its challenge within 28 days after the Authority’s determination was issued, pursuant to s 179(2). [8] Further, the plaintiff says that the time and resources of both parties, their witnesses, and the Authority may be wasted if the Authority proceeds to hear the merits of the defendant’s grievance and determines these, in the event that the Authority’s preliminary determination was...