LCRO 186/2015 TL RH LTD & TL HOLDINGS LTD v QG (6 July 2018) [pdf, 118 KB]
...fiduciary obligations to the VMs as solicitor on the court record. Even if he had wanted to, he could not simply step aside when it became apparent the VMs were unable to pay him. It is also noted that Mr QG had concerns over his firm’s internal resources and doubts about whether the firm had the capacity to deal with TL’s proceedings against the VMs. [35] There was no direct criticism of Mr QG in [Judge A]’s decision. As I read that decision, it captures the essence of t...