Auckland Standards Committee v Hylan [2014] NZLCDT 31 [pdf, 95 KB]
...Mr Morris conceded that the practitioner’s field of practice was in an area of law requiring strong advocacy for vulnerable clients and that there were a limited number of lawyers working in this area. He accepted that diminishing those legal resources for the public was clearly a factor for the Tribunal to consider. He also accepted the glowing references provided by the practitioner, particularly from one senior counsel. [14] In distinguishing the decision of Sorensen4 which h...