HB v JD LCRO 311/2013 (17 December 2014) [pdf, 186 KB]
...Tribunal. 20 Above n 17 at [54](h). 10 [51] However, the subject matter of this case is very specific, and one could say, unique. In the Orlov judgement, the Court noted that “[t]he oversight of the LCRO should also assist in protecting the resources of the Tribunal and prevent it from being overwhelmed by petty or trivial cases”.21 Whilst I do not regard this matter as “petty” or “trivial”, I do not regard it such as to require the attention of the Tribunal. It...