Search Results

1. Juror Satisfaction Survey: 2018 results [pdf, 797 KB]

   ...“does not apply to me” and “don’t know” interchangeably. This will have an influence on the adjustment process as it cannot be inferred from the responses whether they do not know about the information because they did not need to use the resource, or whether they did not know due to technical difficulties or other inconveniences. The raw data for this question can be found in the master spreadsheet. Survey administration Survey forms are distributed by court staff to j...

2. [2020] NZREADT 54 - Beath v The Real Estate Agents Authority (29 October 2020) [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...include: [a] Whether time and cost for the parties, and the Tribunal, will be saved if consolidation is ordered. This was noted as a factor in favour of consolidation in Medlab Hamilton Ltd v Waikato District Health Board. 7 [b] Whether judicial resources will be used more efficiently if consolidation is ordered. In Amalgamated Finance Ltd v Wyness, it was held that it would be convenient, desirable and expeditious for four proceedings to be tried at the same time, given that th...

3. Watene v Edwards - Mangaroa X (2021) 87 Takitimu MB 190 (87 TKT 190) [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...of a meeting to discuss his use of the land. [17] In addition, Mr Edwards acknowledged that it was appropriate for all the trustees to be removed given what he described as their neglect and, effectively, mismanagement of the trust land and resources. He referred to what was described as the trustees’ failure to renew the lease that had been entered into with his father, James Edwards, and also the alleged inability of those trustees to properly consult and engage with the bene...

4. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Commissioner of Police (Discovery) [2020] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...of irrelevant items have been 5 returned, making the search not reliable. Each email would have to be manually processed, that is read individually, to determine whether there is a potential relevance to the present case. This would be a resource intensive undertaking owing to the seniority of the three employees. One is currently the Acting Assistant Commissioner and one is District Commander for Central. Because of their seniority only certain people with the required securi...

5. [2020] NZEmpC 160 Van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...rounds; (b) Searched through Alliance’s electronic files in relation to the relevant bargaining rounds; (c) Had Alliance’s IT search across Alliance’s systems for search terms “Maria” and “Kleef” including searching across Human Resources documents, the Chief Executive Officer’s documents, and the wider electronic system; (d) Reviewed documents disclosed during the Employment Relations Authority investigation meeting, including those in the bundle of documents...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 19 - DMX v Guich (11 May 2020) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...source, the governing legislation. [57] Mr Guich appears to have neither looked at the letter nor the website, instead relying on a hard copy guide in his office, which turned out to be several years out of date. That is always the risk with resource materials held in hard copy in an office. He was not entitled to determine the appeal period, a critical calculation as he accepts, in that way. [58] Mr Guich relies on the Tribunal’s decision in E v S where a complaint including a...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 81 AlKazaz v Asparona Ltd [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...others at Deloitte to impede his utilisation and redeployment. The categories read as follows: 10) Mr Ahmed AlKazaz's requests which were made few months prior to the end of his employment by email to his colleague (Nick Charles) and the resources manager at DeloitteAsparona’s business practice which was approved for him to be deployed on upcoming Database Administration in light of his previous work as a Database Administrator in the past. Also, how and why did Ms Kenri...

8. [2021] NZACDT 14 - YC v Wan (29 June 2021) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...They feel obliged to compensate her for some costs, though not all her expenses. [27] Mr Wan and Ms Han offer a refund of $1,995 and additional compensation of $1,630: Reconsideration application fee $220 s 61 request $410 Time and resources for them to process a reconsideration and s 61 request $1,000 $1,630 JURISDICTION [28] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to impose sanctions is set out in the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act). Having heard a compl...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 113 Waitoa v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...relation to any decisions to be made regarding Mrs Waitoa arising out of the sit-in. The Manager Operational Support, Residential and High Needs was tasked to undertake an investigation of the sit-in incident with the support of MSD’s human resources. Usually it would be the Residence Manager (in this case Mr Kuiti) who would conduct the disciplinary investigation, but as he was involved, it was not appropriate for him to do so. Mrs Waitoa was represented by the PSA during the...

10. [2021] NZSSAA 9 (26 March 2021) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...[9] Section 95 of the Act establishes Temporary Additional Support to provide temporary financial assistance, as a last resort, to alleviate financial hardship for people who cannot meet essential costs from their chargeable income and other resources. Chargeable income includes the cost of accommodation. [10] Section 304 of the Act provides that the Ministry may review a benefit to ascertain whether the beneficiary remains entitled to receive the benefit or to review the rate o...