Search Results

1. Edwards – Whakatōhea (2018) 183 Waiariki MB 169-194 (183 WAR 169) [pdf, 534 KB]

   ...was; the National Maori Congress; and the Crown-congress joint working-party. The political environment of the time began to generate a number of representation and mandate disputes, particularly in respect of issues such as claim settlements, resource management consultations, fishing quota allocations, and the like. The particular concern of the chief judge was that those issues of representation were being brought to the Waitangi Tribunal, and as a result the resources of the tri...

2. Deputy Registrar - Utakura 7 Block (2010) 7 Taitokerau MB 71 (7 TTK 71) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...methods: a) By dedication; b) Under the Public Works legislation; c) By the Governor taking or proclaiming a roadway under the Native land legislation; d) By order of the Maori Land Court; e) Upon deposit of a subdivision plan under s 238 of the Resource Management Act 1991 and its predecessors. [16] I do not include in my discussion the doctrine of prescriptive easements. The limitations of the doctrine in relation to Maori customary land and Maori freehold land are thoroughly d...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 77 Jones v Downer NZ Ltd [pdf, 482 KB]

   ...dates; and (e) failing to carry out work issued to him in a reasonable and timely manner. [36] The disciplinary meeting was held on 23 June 2016. 23 June 2016 meeting [37] The attendees at this meeting were Mr Dawson, Mr Gray, a human resources manager, Mr Jones and his representative. Before reaching any conclusions, Mr Gray decided not to proceed with a disciplinary investigation and, instead, to attempt to make the employment relationship functional. He ended the mee...

4. Brown - Kairakau 2C5B (2002) 167 Napier MB 139 (167 NA 139) [pdf, 857 KB]

   ...of Part Kairakau 2C5B. On balance therefore, the situation is that while the minority owners have not paid their share of rates on lime at various point in lime since 1992, that situation appears now to have been remedied. Building activities lack resource consent The other aspect of co-ownership that has concerned the Browns is that the minority owners have erected various structures on Lot 2 without obtaining resource consents. The structures in question are an ablution block, a septi...

5. Family Court rewrite submission: Backbone Collective [pdf, 295 KB]

   1 Submission to the Review into the Family Court 2014 Reforms Prepared by The Backbone Collective P.O. Box 078 300 Grey Lynn AUCKLAND www.backbone.org.nz info@backbone.org.nz November 2018 Introduction Please find here a written submission to the Family Court Review Panel from the Backbone Collective. We ask that the Review Panel read this submission along with notes taken from our face to face meeting with the Panel on 19 September 2018, the submissions

6. Koso v Chief Executive Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [2014] NZHRRT 39 [pdf, 133 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 39 Reference No. HRRT 043/2011 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN JUNE KOSO PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION, AND EMPLOYMENT DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Small for Plaintiff Mr S Cohen-Ronen for Defendant Ms K Evans for Privacy Commissioner

7. [2019] NZEnvC 172 The New Zealand Fairy Tern Charitable Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 13 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC \ 1 2- of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) the application for enforcement orders under s314 and s319 of the Act THE NEW ZEALAND FAIRY TERN CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2019-AKL-000137) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Commissioner A C E Leijnen Commissioner M Mabin Parties: P Muir for The New Zealand Fairy Tern...

8. Short v Stowers - Te Tumu Kaituna 14 Block [2020] Māori Appellate Court MB 141 (2020 APPEAL 141) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...development of the land; (b) development of the land is clearly desirable; (c) the proposed area would be alienated only to a subsidiary of the trust, and further alienation would require trustee and beneficiary approval; (d) the trust has limited resources and sought a guarantee of the change of status before committing funds to the necessary survey and related expenses for a partition; and (e) the alienation is necessary and desirable to allow for the trust’s commercial operat...

9. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 (2019) 217 Waiariki MB 85 (217 WAR 85) [pdf, 536 KB]

   217 Waiāriki MB 85 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20090014063 A20160006805 UNDER Sections 19, 67, 231, 238 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Whakapoungakau 24 Block BETWEEN JILLIAN NAERA, ERIC HODGE, WARWICK MOREHU, ANAHA MOREHU, BUNNY ORMSBY, KURANGAITUKU FARRELL AND KEREAMA PENE Applicants AND PIRIHIRA FENWICK, WIREMU KINGI (deceased), WINNIE EMERY (deceased) AND HIWINUI HEKE (deceas

10. [2021] NZEnvC 159 Drive Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

    Drive Holdings Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 159 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN DRIVE HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-283) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Commissioner Mabin Deputy Commissioner D Kernohan Hearing: 24 – 28 May 2021 28 June – 2 July 2021 A...