Search Results

1. Children and young people with charges finalised in the Youth Court December 2019 [xlsx, 293 KB]

   Contents Charges for children and young people finalised in the Youth Court This data includes all charges finalised in the Youth Court. The majority of children and young people who get into trouble with the law don't go to court, but are instead dealt with by Police in the community. The Youth Court deals with most criminal offending by children and young people aged 12 to 16 years old that's too serious to be dealt with by the Police in the community. Since 1 July 2019, 1

2. Children and young people with charges finalised in any court December 2019 [xlsx, 301 KB]

   Contents Charges for children and young people finalised in any court This data includes charges for all children and young people finalised in any court (including the Youth, District and High Court). Including the children and young people charged in the District and High Court provides a clearer picture of what is happening for all youth offenders, rather than just those who appear in the Youth Court. Note, however, that the majority of children and young people who get into troubl

3. [2015] NZEmpC 89 Ngawharau v The Porirua Whanau Centre Trust [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...circumstances at the time the dismissal or action occurred. [74] In applying the test, the Court must consider the non-exhaustive list of factors set out in s 103A(3) of the Act. Those factors are: (3) … (a) whether, having regard to the resources available to the employer, the employer sufficiently investigated the allegations against the employee before dismissing or taking action against the employee; and (b) whether the employer raised the concerns that the employe...

4. Katipa v Dobbs - Harataunga 2C1 [2015] Chief Judge's MB 635 (2015 CJ 635) [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...applicant and his whānau will revive their application to redefine the beneficiaries of the marae. This will effectively mean repeating the hui process that the Chief Judge directed, which in the circumstances will be a complete waste of time and resources. It was noted that both parties are in receipt of special aid. [35] In counsels’ submission, an order in line with the resolutions passed at the hui would promote the key principles set out in the preamble to the Act and s 17 o...

5. Taueki v Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation Trust - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block (2016) 347 Aotea MB 269 (347 AOT 269) [pdf, 354 KB]

   ...examine whether Mr Taueki has satisfied any of those subsections. [21] At first blush, the application could only succeed under s 19(1)(a), 19(1)(b) or 19(1)(d) of the Act. This is because s 19(1)(c) refers to the unauthorised removal of natural resources, which is not relevant in the present circumstances. Section 19(1)(a) allows the Court to grant an injunction where there is actual or threatened “trespass” or “other injury” to any Māori freehold land, Māori reservation...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 54 Hamon v Coromandel Independent Living Trust [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...continue in employment from that time may give rise to an issue of waiver. However, that was not pleaded nor argued. [32] To assist Mr Noonan in his dealings with Ms Hamon at the two meetings on 17 December 2007, he had employed a private Human Resources consultant, Ms Raewyn Kirkman. Ms Kirkman in fact drafted the two letters sent to Ms Hamon in preparation for the meetings. She attended both meetings. She gave evidence at the Court hearing. She stated that following the me...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 42 ITE v ALA [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...shared services project; criticisms the plaintiff had of management within the defendant organisation; concerns relating to perceived flaws in the defendant’s security systems; perceived IT risks for both the defendant and other organisations; resourcing concerns and concerns relating to the competency of other employees of the defendant; concerns about the defendant’s financial expenditure; a perceived personal vendetta against the plaintiff by senior management, characterised...

8. Trustees of the Horina Nepia and Te Hiwi Piahana Whanau Trust v Ngati Tukorehe Tribal Committee & Tahamata Incorporation (2014) 314 Aotea MB 159 (314 AOT 159) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...foreshadowed, his principal concern was that on the available evidence NTTC did not appear to display the usual accountability, reporting and transparency mechanisms expected of a land holding entity acting on behalf of beneficiaries of communally owned resources. However, those concerns would no longer be relevant if the shares were transferred to a trust created under the Māori Affairs Act 1953. Ohau Pā Reserve is just such a trust that is legally accountable to the beneficiarie...

9. Henton v REAA, Max House & Barfoot & Thompson Ltd [2013] NZREADT 18 [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...its way through the system with the Real Estate Agents Authority; (b) His separate complaint about the complaint-handling process, which was dismissed by the Committee; and (c) The present appeal against that dismissal taking up time and resources of the Tribunal. The second respondents understand the Authority's wish to try to widen the scope as much as possible for potential unsatisfactory conduct findings, but it is submitted that the present attempts are taking this...

10. Andrews v Commissioner of Police [2013] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 121 KB]

    ...fair balance between the general public interest and important personal rights of individual citizens. In the present context it means that accused persons ought not to be left handicapped by a lack of relevant information and by the imbalance of resources available to them in preparing a defence compared with those at the disposal of the State. So that all relevant information in the hands of the prosecution should be made available to the defence subject only to exceptions needed to av...