Search Results

1. West & Anor as Trustees of the Christine West Family Trust v Perry [pdf, 769 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 02368 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN CHRISTINE MURIEL WEST and WILLIAM HENRY HAWKEN as Trustees of the CHRISTINE WEST FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND GLENN ANDREW PERRY and LYNDA MAREE PERRY First Respondents AND JESSOP ARCHITECTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND BERNIE W LEE trading as Island 2000 Third Respondent AND No fourth respondents, Michael Craig Norgate an

2. NZCVS Social Wellbeing Report Tables [xlsx, 589 KB]

   ...standard error greater than or equal to 50%, which is considered too unreliable for general use. * Statistically significant difference from the New Zealand average, or the relevant total, at the 95% confidence level. Related products Refer to resources and results for a full set of available NZCVS resources including the NZCVS Key Findings report (Cycle 1). Contact us for further information about these and related statistics mailto:NZCVS@justice.govt.nzhttps://www.justice.go...

3. Access to Justice Legal Needs Survey Final Report - October 2024 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...difficulties with ACC – the Accident Compensation Corporation) – 5% • Financial provider issue (such as insurance companies, banks, tax, trusts or investments) – 5% • Environmental issue (such as pollution, waste dumping, or access to community resources) – 5% • Welfare benefit issue (including difficulties or disputes about eligibility, support or reviewing a benefit decision) – 4% • Product or service issue arising from an ‘offline’ purchase (i.e. not purchas...

4. Meulenbroek v Vision Antenna Systems Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 226 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT [51] Reference No. HRRT 020/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN MARK CHRISTOPHER MEULENBROEK PLAINTIFF AND VISION ANTENNA SYSTEMS LIMITED DEFENDANT AT INVERCARGILL BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee and Ms JV Emerson for plaintiff Ms RK Brazil and Ms H Young for defendant DATE OF HEARING:

5. Evaluation of early outcomes of Te Kooti Rangatahi/Rangatahi Court [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...stages of the evaluation, a number of key informants considered that the perceptions and experiences of rangatahi appearing before Ngā Kooti Rangatahi should be compared with those of rangatahi appearing before the Youth Courts. However given finite resources, the Ministry of Justice proposed that this question be explored by asking rangatahi, whānau and youth justice professionals who had been exposed to the Youth Court about their perceptions of the two court settings.7 In addition,...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 122 Campbell v The Commissioner of Salford School [pdf, 631 KB]

   ...consult with the Board on any proposed action relevant to the exercise of power, the LSM was not required to obtain the Board’s agreement before exercising the functions and powers vested in him. [32] Mr Macdonald had a background in human resources and employment relations; he also had a close association with educational institutions having worked with schools as an employment advisor; and had been appointed on some nine occasions as a LSM. He considered such a role to be a...

7. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Wairoa [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...the Waitangi Tribunal, which will receive the final version as evidence in its hearings of claims. Other district reports have been, or will be, published in this series, Which, when complete, will provide a national theme of loss of land and other resources by Maori since 1840. Each survey has been written in the light of the objectives of the Rangahaua Whanui project, as set out in a practice note by Chief Judge E T J Durie in September 1993 (see app I). I must emphasise that Rangaha...

8. [2012] NZEmpC 96 South Pacific Meats Ltd v Mohammed [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...this revelation and told Mr Shanks that he would be returning on 3 August 2009 regardless. When questioned, Mr Shanks said that he could not recall such a conversation. [26] Mr Mohammed sought assistance from his friend and previous Human Resources Manager at another plant, Mr Small. Mr Mohammed and his son’s evidence is broadly consistent with what Mr Small had to say. His evidence was that he rang the company on 31 July 2009 and spoke to the receptionist, asking to speak...

9. [2006] NZEmpC AC 52/06 Simpsons Farms Ltd v Aberhart [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...the Employment Relations Law Reform Bill, the Minister summarised s103A as follows: Overall, the test is to be an objective one. This is not a radical revamp of the dismissal law. It draws from existing case law and fits well within good human resources practice. [58] Although not, or at least not only, in s103A, Parliament contemporaneously legislated expressly for minimum requirements of procedural fairness in employment relationships including, in particular, the circumstances...

10. [2006] NZEmpC AC 50/06 Tu'itupou v Guardian Healthcare Operations Ltd [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...these words or words similar to them were used. [14] The correspondence following the dismissal meeting is annexed to both Mrs Tu’itupou’s brief of evidence, now sworn as an affidavit, and the affidavit of Mr Walter Bruce Wall, National Human Resources Manager for the defendant. Mr Wall’s affidavit was sworn on the 2 August 2006. [15] On the 14 June 2002 Ms Schaaf wrote to Ms Jolly as follows: As indicated to you yesterday, Mrs Tupou Tu'itupou will be lodging a personal...