8835 items matching your search terms
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 117 Ref: LCRO 35/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN UX1 Applicant AND RT Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant,
RANGAHAUA WHANUI NATIONAL THEME L THE TRUST ADMINISTRATION OF MAORI RESERVES, 1840-1913 RALPH JOHNSON AUGUST 1997 FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland (pt I), R Daamen, P Ramer, and Dr B Rigby; (pt 11), M Belgrave District 5B: Gisborne, S Daly District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr District 9: The Whanganui Distr
0 ACCESS TO JUSTICE: LEGAL NEEDS SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT FINAL REPORT 29 October 2024 1 Table of Contents 1 Background and purpose of Legal Needs Survey ...........................................................................5 2 Sampling .....................................................................................................6 2.1 Recruiting adults .........................................
...not to attend because of his resignation. On 8 December Mr Welch contacted the defendant to arrange a meeting to discuss the restructuring and, I find, the handover of the clients. The defendant had already given his laptop to Hally‘s human resources manager, Amanda Nottingham. The defendant was placed on garden leave through to the end date of his employment on 7 February 2011. [22] At the meeting on 9 December, Ms Nottingham and Mr Welch discussed the defendant‘s role t...
MUNZ AND ORS V TLNZ LTD AND ANOR AK AC 51A/07 21 December 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 51A/07 ARC 34/07 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority and for declarations and injunction BETWEEN MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INC First Plaintiff AND HENRY NEE NEE AND HENRY TOLEAFOA Second Plaintiffs AND TONY SMART Third Plaintiff AND TLNZ LTD First Defendant AND TLNZ (AUCKLAND) LIMITED Second Defendant
...of the application was essentially an administrative action, it was due largely to the internal problems amongst the former trustees, the lack of available funds as a result of the actions of some of those trustees and, consequently, the limited resources of the current trustees to be able to pursue the proceedings. [44] BHS argues that it is highly unlikely that the access sought by the trust would have been granted and even if it had, then significant conditions as to compensation...
...stretch” and the closest that he was prepared to venture was the freedom from unreasonable seizure in s 21. Mr Palmer submitted that it might be said that a wages clerk, required to refund deductions unlawfully made from the clerk’s own financial resources in circumstances where the clerk was innocent personally of any breach of the Act, might be said to be an unreasonable seizure of those monies. Mr Palmer felt obliged to concede, however, that even if this argument m...
...the quality of Mr Yan’s work not being of the required standard. Mr Haycock provided Mr Yan with these complaints and discussed the details of them with him. [11] Mr Haycock and Mr Oomen took the precaution of seeking advice from the human resources team within the Department. It was confirmed that a formal performance improvement process was appropriate. A document setting out a number of draft expectations and measures (known as a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)) was pr...
1 July 2015 and 31 December 2015 10 2 Coroners have a duty to identify any lessons learned from the deaths referred to them that might help prevent such deaths occurring in the future. In order to publicise these lessons, the findings and recommendations of most cases are open to the public. Recommendations Recap identifies and summarises all coronial recommendations that have been made over the relevant period. Wh
...(“Clifden”), in relation to the subdivision of land it owned at Taylors Mistake Road, Christchurch. Mr Withers was acting as solicitor for Clifden on the matter, and he was also a director and shareholder in Clifden. [44] The Council had issued a resource consent for the subdivision, and a development contribution of $117,916.10 was required to be paid by Clifden to the Council as part of the subdivision process. [45] The Council’s policy was that the development cont...