Search Results

1. UK v VL LCRO 142/2013 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 257 KB]

   LCRO 142/2013 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING A determination of the National Standards Committee BETWEEN UK Applicant AND VL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr [UK] has applied for a review of a decision by the National Standards Committee dated 12 April 2013 in which the Co

2. LCRO 173/2014 G NP and H NP v DC (27 September 2018) [pdf, 289 KB]

   LCRO 173/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN G NP and H NP Applicant AND DC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] G NP and H NP (the NPs) have applied to review a decision by the [Area] Standards Committe

3. LCRO 91/2019 CL v BK and AM (31 August 2021) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...ensuring minimum standards 24 Letter, HJ to LCS, 8 March 2019. 25 Sections 3(1) and 12(a). 26 Duncan Webb, ‘Unsatisfactory Conduct,’ September 2008) available at the Ministry of Justice website Legal Complaints Review Officer – Guidelines and Resources. “While in practice the two [standards] will frequently converge, the shift in focus is an important signal”. 19 of service”.27 The duty is concerned with “the outcome of lawyer’s work rather than the way in which...

4. Stewart v Manu Ariki Marae Reservation Trust - Manu Ariki Maori Reservation (2021) 436 Aotea MB 209 (436 AOT 209) [pdf, 501 KB]

   ...Phillips carried out his healing, which attracted his 14 Barlow v Phillips, above n 1, at [65]. 15 Barlow v Phillips, above n 1, at [70]. 16 Barlow v Phillips, above n 1, at [76]-[80]. 436 Aotea MB 226 supporters, and they then provided resources to assist him to build the marae complex at Manu Ariki. I consider that during his lifetime he was a charismatic figure who influenced many people to join the Society and to seek to bring to fruition the vision he promoted for ho...

5. LCRO 175/2022 OP v VN (10 October 2023) [pdf, 315 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 118 Ref: LCRO 175/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN OP Applicant AND VN Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr OP has applie

6. Kelly v Tall Poppies Education Limited [2024] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 339 KB]

   ...vetting checks ‘and any other checks that the directors of Tall Poppies may reasonably require.’ [23.4] Responsible for setting her own fees and invoicing clients. Tall Poppies was required to pay Ms Kelly 50 per cent of the government’s resource subsidy and 100 per cent of 20 hours Early Childhood Education funding per eligible child in her care. [23.5] Able to offer care to a maximum of 4 children at any one time and only between 6 am and 7 pm Monday to Friday. [23.6] R...

7. AML/CFT ministerial exemption decisions

   Ministerial exemptions, listed in order of date granted. Exemption notices (PDFs) Gazette and date Nelson Angel Women's Loan Fund 2024-go6493 - 16 December 2024 The Tindall Foundation 2024-go6492 - 16 December 2024 Toha Foundry Limited 2024-go6490 - 16 December 2024 Crown Infrastructure Partners Limited 2024-go6488 - 16 December 2024 The Ernst & Young entities & Corrigendum 2024-go6004 - 21 Nov 2024 2024-go6114 - 27 Nov 2024 Twentymans Funeral Services Limited & Corrig

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Key initiatives >
   3. Tackling money laundering and terrorist financing >
   4. Information for businesses >
   5. AML/CFT ministerial exemptions

8. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination Summary of submissions [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination Summary of submissions Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to

9. Technical report of evaluation of the court-referred restorative justice pilot [pdf, 681 KB]

   ...level of participation in this conference; and whether or not anyone (including professionals) had inappropriately dominated the discussion or intervened inappropriately during the conference. Then, they were asked about the sufficiency of funds or resources for setting up and holding this conference, whether or not it had taken account of the offender’s and victim’s interests, and whether or not it was culturally appropriate for the victim and for the offender. Finally, with res...

10. Far North District Council - Okahu 3B2B2 (2015) 97 Taitokerau MB 234 (97 TTK 234) [pdf, 396 KB]

    97 Taitokerau MB 234 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20120014247 UNDER Section 183, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 3B2B2 Block BETWEEN FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant A20140010697 UNDER Section 215, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 1, 3B2B2A, 3B2B2C, 3B2B2D, 4A, 4B, 4D, 4C1, 4C2, 3A 3B2A Blocks BETWEEN TE URI REIHANA-NGATOTE and