Search Results

1. Qualitative study on behalf of the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice system reforms [pdf, 943 KB]

   ...experiences to demonstrate the impact on children of their parent’s actions. • Good news stories; demonstrating that the system can (and does) work. • Parents with a disability suggested a ‘disability platform’/ tool kit/ website, as a go to resource for parents facing additional stress and burden. Again, including case studies and real-life examples. • Parents need to be reminded to ‘look after themselves’ and to make sure they have a support network....

2. Eichelbaum report [pdf, 441 KB]

   1 I N D E X 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 2.1 Children’s names 2.2 Background 2.3 The Investigation 2.4 The charges 2.5 Depositions 2.6 In the High Court 2.7 The trial 2.8 The 1994 Appeal 2.9 The 1999 Appeal 3. The Ministerial Inquiry 3.1 The Terms of Reference 3.2 Interpretation 4. Process 4.1 Representation of parents 4.2 Appointment of Experts 4.3 The Regulat

3. Young people & infringement fines: a qualitative study [pdf, 139 KB]

   Young People and Infringement Fines: A Qualitative Study Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Litmus Limited October 2005 2 DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. The report has been prepared by the research company and the views expressed in it are those of the research company and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Justice. First published in October 2005 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand ISBN 0-

4. [2008] NZEmpC WC 17/08 Witcombe v Clerk of the House of Representatives [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...alleged misconduct. The second purpose was to seek legal advice about the process of that investigation and the content of the report. [61] In Simunovich, the High Court Judge himself found only one judgment of direct assistance, that in Auag Resources Ltd & Anor v Amax Gold Mines New Zealand Ltd & Ors HC Auckland, CL59/93, 17 June 1994. There the challenge was to a claim of privilege in draft minutes of joint venture directors’ meetings. Henry J in Auag concluded that...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 40 B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...raised about the nature of the pill that the plaintiff had given her. [15] An employment investigation was commenced. Mr Lowe was responsible for undertaking the investigation and was assisted in this task by Mr Scott (the company’s Human Resources Manager). Ms Dons, a manager within the Crew area, interviewed those involved in the spa pool incident and provided written statements to Mr Lowe and Mr Scott. [16] Ms Dons did not give evidence but it is apparent that she too...

6. NZCASS Data tables 5 public perceptions [xlsx, 851 KB]

   ...NZCASS 2014 for a general audience. Data item (variable) list A complete list of data items (variables) that are available for analysis, and will also help people who are interested in technical aspects of NZCASS analysis and reporting. Refer to Resources and downloads for a full list of NZCASS 2014 reporting products Contact us for further information about these and related statistics http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/n/new-zealand-crime-and-sa...

7. Wihelmus Hooft van Huijsduijnen v Woodley [2012] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 451 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000028 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 11 BETWEEN RONALD ALOYSIUS WIHELMUS AND MARTINA HELENA MARIA HOOFT VAN HUIJSDUIJNEN Claimants AND EDWARD MERVYN JOHN AND LYNETTE ANNE CATHERINE WOODLEY First Respondents AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND ALAN GORDON MINTY (Removed) Third Respondent AND SAWREY CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND DONALD JOHN HAWINKELS Fifth Respo

8. [2016] NZEmpC 143 Borsboom (Labour Inspector) v Preet PVT Ltd [pdf, 667 KB]

   JEANIE MAY BORSBOOM (LABOUR INSPECTOR) v PREET PVT LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 143 [4 November 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 143 EMPC 95/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JEANIE MAY BORSBOOM (LABOUR INSPECTOR) Plaintiff AND PREET PVT LIMITED First Defendant AND WARRINGTON DISCOUNT TOBACCO LIMITED Second Defendant

9. [2016] NZEmpC 136 Xtreme Dining Ltd t/a Think Steel v Dewar [pdf, 391 KB]

   ...Events following the termination [54] Mr Dewar then laid a complaint of assault with the police regarding Mr Gard’s action in pushing him. Subsequently the police stated that the complaint was unlikely to be investigated having regard to resource issues. [55] Late on 3 February 2015, Mr Dewar emailed Mr Gard stating that he was very upset about the events of that day. He confirmed that he had never stolen anything from Mr Gard or from Think Steel. He strongly disagreed wit...

10. Deputy Registrar v Moeahu – Lot 1 DP 17494 Part Section 2345 New Plymouth (Old Railway Station) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 3 (437 AOT 3) [pdf, 550 KB]

    ...funds. (e) The trustees also received fees and payments in the 2016 and 2017 years, further contributing to the loss suffered. (f) The trustees did not have sufficient information to make informed decisions on the management of the trust’s resources. Finance reports were intermittent and those that were did not contain all relevant information. Budgets were provided and adopted, albeit well into each financial year, but without the accompanying relevant financial information,...