Search Results

1. Chapman v Aotearoa Resorts Ltd - Tokaanu Māori Township 2nd Residue Trust (2010) 257 Aotea MB 62 (257 AOT 62) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...adjournment until the determination of the appeal. He submitted that there would be a real risk of the third and fourth respondents being drawn into costly satellite litigation to the appeal where he contended it would be a more efficient use time and resources to await the outcome of the appeal. For the applicants Mr Laurenson argued that his clients preferred that the second relief application proceed as soon as possible while recognising that there was some force in the argumen...

2. Inaia Tonu Nei - Hui Maori - Combined version PDF [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   Kua tae te wā Te Pūrongo a Te Hui Māori HŌNGONGOI 2019 Hei whakarāpopoto tēnei pūrongo i ngā kōrero i puta rā i te hui e kīa nei Ināia Tonu Nei – Hui Māori i tū i Rotorua mai i te 5–7 Āperira 2019. Nā tētahi tira iti i tuhi ngā kōrero o te Hui Māori, nāna hoki i kohi ngā whakaaro mai i ngā whakawhitinga kōrero, i ngā kauwhau me ngā mahi ā-rōpū. Te whāinga o tēnei pukapuka he hopu i ngā kōrero i puta i te Hui, me te tāpae horopaki hoki mō te pūta

3. RIS - Abortion Law Reform [pdf, 750 KB]

   Impact Statement: Abortion Law Reform | 1 Abortion law reform Advising agencies Ministry of Justice Decision sought This analysis has been prepared to inform decisions by Cabinet in its consideration of the Law Commission’s briefing paper about options to take a health approach to abortion law. Proposing Ministers Minister of Justice Summary: Problem and Proposed Approach Problem Definition What problem or opportunity does this proposal seek to address? Why is G

4. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (HDC Act) [2020] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 434 KB]

   IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 041/2018 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN EAMON HENNING MARSHALL PLAINTIFF AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED DEFENDANT AT NAPIER BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia JP, Member Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr GW Marshall as agent for his son Ms I Reuv

5. [2022] NZEmpC 5 VMR v Civil Aviation Authority [pdf, 519 KB]

   ...through its Minister, put policy and strategy before the interests of his employees, even before the Order was issued. Good faith was undermined so that the organisation did not listen to its employees, and there was an imbalance of power and resources. [109] Permanent reinstatement would be justified, because arguably the amended Order did not apply to the plaintiffs and/or there was a reasonable prospect that government responses would change. There were no operational impedime...

6. OIA-118936.pdf [pdf, 3.3 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 28 March 2025 Ref: OIA 118936 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Reform of the Limitation Act 2010 Thank you for your email of 24 January 2025 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding reforms to the Limitation Act 2010 in respect of historic claims of abuse in care. Specifically, you

7. Qualitative study on behalf of the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice system reforms [pdf, 943 KB]

   ...experiences to demonstrate the impact on children of their parent’s actions. • Good news stories; demonstrating that the system can (and does) work. • Parents with a disability suggested a ‘disability platform’/ tool kit/ website, as a go to resource for parents facing additional stress and burden. Again, including case studies and real-life examples. • Parents need to be reminded to ‘look after themselves’ and to make sure they have a support network....

8. Eichelbaum report [pdf, 441 KB]

   1 I N D E X 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 2.1 Children’s names 2.2 Background 2.3 The Investigation 2.4 The charges 2.5 Depositions 2.6 In the High Court 2.7 The trial 2.8 The 1994 Appeal 2.9 The 1999 Appeal 3. The Ministerial Inquiry 3.1 The Terms of Reference 3.2 Interpretation 4. Process 4.1 Representation of parents 4.2 Appointment of Experts 4.3 The Regulat

9. Young people & infringement fines: a qualitative study [pdf, 139 KB]

   Young People and Infringement Fines: A Qualitative Study Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Litmus Limited October 2005 2 DISCLAIMER This research was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. The report has been prepared by the research company and the views expressed in it are those of the research company and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Justice. First published in October 2005 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand ISBN 0-

10. [2008] NZEmpC WC 17/08 Witcombe v Clerk of the House of Representatives [pdf, 219 KB]

    ...alleged misconduct. The second purpose was to seek legal advice about the process of that investigation and the content of the report. [61] In Simunovich, the High Court Judge himself found only one judgment of direct assistance, that in Auag Resources Ltd & Anor v Amax Gold Mines New Zealand Ltd & Ors HC Auckland, CL59/93, 17 June 1994. There the challenge was to a claim of privilege in draft minutes of joint venture directors’ meetings. Henry J in Auag concluded that...