Search Results

1. Appendix One to Cabinet Paper Reforming the Privacy Act 1993 [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...currently preformed by the Director. Reject. The primary conciliation role of the Commissioner is maintained, and the continued separation of compliance and litigation functions ensures that parties can freely engage in conciliation Prosecutorial resources and expertise will not need to be duplicated in OPC. 61 The chairperson of the Human Rights Review Tribunal should be a judge at the level of a District Court Judge. Reject. No evidence that previous chairs have been subject...

2. Proprietors of Potikirua Block Incorporated v Te Kani - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 8212 [2013] Chief Judge's MB 82 (2013 CJ 82) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   2013 Chief Judge's MB 82 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20110012322 CJ 2011/44 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 1 Deposited Plan 8212 formerly pati of Potikirua Incorporation BETWEEN The Proprietors of Potikirua Block Incorporation Applicant AND Parekura Te Kani (now deceased) Respondent Hearing: 16 December 2011,45 Waiariki MB 47-48 9 March 2012,2012 Chief Judge's MB 87 10 July 2012,23 Tairawhiti MB 2

3. [2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum and Hastings v Corporate Consumables Ltd [pdf, 598 KB]

   MARY KATHLEEN SCHOLLUM v CORPORATE CONSUMABLES LIMITED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 115 [27 September 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 115 EMPC 204/2016 IN THE MATTER OF A referral of a question of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MARY KATHLEEN SCHOLLUM First Plaintiff AND JONATHAN WAYNE HASTINGS Second Plaintiff AND CORPORATE CONSUMABLES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27 - 30 Ma

4. Hutcheson v Houkamau - Porangahau 2B No 10 (2021) 88 Takitimu MB 118 (88 TKT 118) [pdf, 581 KB]

   88 Tākitimu MB 118 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20180005757 WĀHANGA Under Regulation 21, Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 Sections 37, 236, 237, 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Porangahau 2B No 10 and Other Blocks (Rongomaraeroa Marae) I WAENGA I A Between AIMEE WHAITIRI HUTCHESON, NICHOLAS REIHANA

5. UK v VL LCRO 142/2013 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 257 KB]

   LCRO 142/2013 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING A determination of the National Standards Committee BETWEEN UK Applicant AND VL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr [UK] has applied for a review of a decision by the National Standards Committee dated 12 April 2013 in which the Co

6. LCRO 173/2014 G NP and H NP v DC (27 September 2018) [pdf, 289 KB]

   LCRO 173/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN G NP and H NP Applicant AND DC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] G NP and H NP (the NPs) have applied to review a decision by the [Area] Standards Committe

7. LCRO 91/2019 CL v BK and AM (31 August 2021) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...ensuring minimum standards 24 Letter, HJ to LCS, 8 March 2019. 25 Sections 3(1) and 12(a). 26 Duncan Webb, ‘Unsatisfactory Conduct,’ September 2008) available at the Ministry of Justice website Legal Complaints Review Officer – Guidelines and Resources. “While in practice the two [standards] will frequently converge, the shift in focus is an important signal”. 19 of service”.27 The duty is concerned with “the outcome of lawyer’s work rather than the way in which...

8. Stewart v Manu Ariki Marae Reservation Trust - Manu Ariki Maori Reservation (2021) 436 Aotea MB 209 (436 AOT 209) [pdf, 501 KB]

   ...Phillips carried out his healing, which attracted his 14 Barlow v Phillips, above n 1, at [65]. 15 Barlow v Phillips, above n 1, at [70]. 16 Barlow v Phillips, above n 1, at [76]-[80]. 436 Aotea MB 226 supporters, and they then provided resources to assist him to build the marae complex at Manu Ariki. I consider that during his lifetime he was a charismatic figure who influenced many people to join the Society and to seek to bring to fruition the vision he promoted for ho...

9. LCRO 175/2022 OP v VN (10 October 2023) [pdf, 315 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 118 Ref: LCRO 175/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN OP Applicant AND VN Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr OP has applie

10. Kelly v Tall Poppies Education Limited [2024] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 339 KB]

    ...vetting checks ‘and any other checks that the directors of Tall Poppies may reasonably require.’ [23.4] Responsible for setting her own fees and invoicing clients. Tall Poppies was required to pay Ms Kelly 50 per cent of the government’s resource subsidy and 100 per cent of 20 hours Early Childhood Education funding per eligible child in her care. [23.5] Able to offer care to a maximum of 4 children at any one time and only between 6 am and 7 pm Monday to Friday. [23.6] R...