Search Results

Search results for resources.

9017 items matching your search terms

  1. Wihelmus Hooft van Huijsduijnen v Woodley [2012] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 451 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000028 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 11 BETWEEN RONALD ALOYSIUS WIHELMUS AND MARTINA HELENA MARIA HOOFT VAN HUIJSDUIJNEN Claimants AND EDWARD MERVYN JOHN AND LYNETTE ANNE CATHERINE WOODLEY First Respondents AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND ALAN GORDON MINTY (Removed) Third Respondent AND SAWREY CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND DONALD JOHN HAWINKELS Fifth Respo

  2. [2016] NZEmpC 143 Borsboom (Labour Inspector) v Preet PVT Ltd [pdf, 667 KB]

    JEANIE MAY BORSBOOM (LABOUR INSPECTOR) v PREET PVT LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 143 [4 November 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 143 EMPC 95/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JEANIE MAY BORSBOOM (LABOUR INSPECTOR) Plaintiff AND PREET PVT LIMITED First Defendant AND WARRINGTON DISCOUNT TOBACCO LIMITED Second Defendant

  3. [2016] NZEmpC 136 Xtreme Dining Ltd t/a Think Steel v Dewar [pdf, 391 KB]

    ...Events following the termination [54] Mr Dewar then laid a complaint of assault with the police regarding Mr Gard’s action in pushing him. Subsequently the police stated that the complaint was unlikely to be investigated having regard to resource issues. [55] Late on 3 February 2015, Mr Dewar emailed Mr Gard stating that he was very upset about the events of that day. He confirmed that he had never stolen anything from Mr Gard or from Think Steel. He strongly disagreed wit...

  4. Deputy Registrar v Moeahu – Lot 1 DP 17494 Part Section 2345 New Plymouth (Old Railway Station) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 3 (437 AOT 3) [pdf, 550 KB]

    ...funds. (e) The trustees also received fees and payments in the 2016 and 2017 years, further contributing to the loss suffered. (f) The trustees did not have sufficient information to make informed decisions on the management of the trust’s resources. Finance reports were intermittent and those that were did not contain all relevant information. Budgets were provided and adopted, albeit well into each financial year, but without the accompanying relevant financial information,...

  5. 3-Strikes-Proactive-Release-OIA-Requests_Final_Part1.pdf [pdf, 20 MB]

    ...some information withheld as it is out of scope. Publicly available.56 4 www.nzherald.co.nz/the-listener/new-zealand/law-society-bringing-back-the-three-strikes-regime-would-be-a-backwards-step/PXODCHIS25AKHHRPUT7LYMTHIA/ 5 www.parliament.nz/resource/en-NZ/53SCJU_ADV_117743_JU226931/b6ae781adb48f5a824f73a2bf094309179e4ffd8 6 www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Three-Strikes-Law-Evidence-Brief.pdf 31 Email RE_ First draft of ToW implications of three strikes - comments on post-agency cons...

  6. Attitudes to crime & punishment: a New Zealand study [pdf, 541 KB]

    Attitudes to Crime and Punishment: A New Zealand Study Judy Paulin Wendy Searle Trish Knaggs December 2003 ii iii First published in December 2003 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISBN 478-20162-1 iv Foreword The report presents the findings of the first comprehensive national survey of the views of a sample of adult New Zealanders about crime and the criminal justice system’s response to crime. A random sample of 1500 adult Ne

  7. Māori Land Court judgments subject index [pdf, 846 KB]

    Date of Judgment Citation MB reference MLIS Ref Legislation Subject Judge 15.12.2015 Trustees of Te Ngae Farm Trust v Trustees of the Ngāti Rangiteaorere Koromatua Council - Te Ngae Farm Trust 133 Waiariki MB 58 133 WAR 158 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 s 79 Costs J Coxhead 11.12.2015 Peters v Foster - Hereheretau B2J8 and B2K2B 54 Tairawhiti MB 147 54 TRW 147 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 s 238,240 Enforce obligations of Trust, removal of trustee CJ Isaac 10.12.2

  8. [2015] NZEmpC 7 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 280 KB]

    WILLIE ALATIPI v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 7 [5 February 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 7 WRC 12/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN WILLIE ALATIPI Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Defendant Hearing: 1-5 and 23 September 2014 (heard at Wellington) Appe

  9. Recommendations recap - issue 7 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    Recommendations recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 July and 30 September 2013 Issue 7 Published by the Ministry of Justice ISSN 2253‑5152 DISCLAIMER This publication has been produced by the research counsel of the Office of the Chief Coroner. The best effort has been made to accurately summarise the circumstances, findings and recommendations made by the coroner in each case – despite this, these are not exact replications of coronial findin

  10. MacGregor v Craig [2016] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...terms of the Act had lent the process a quasi-judicial character and the requirement of observing the principles of natural justice had resulted in an elaborate and protracted system of provisional and final opinions. The length of the process and the resources consumed led the Re- Evaluation team to recommend a conciliation process to be carried out principally by staff rather than by Commissioners. Where this was unsuccessful, the complaint was to be referred to the (then) Proceedings Co...