Search Results

1. Carley (INZ) v Navarette-Scholes [2015] NZIACDT 112 (24 December 2015) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...timeframe to commence that, but did not renew her licence. [6] The Registrar considered that the Tribunal may order that Ms Navarette-Scholes not apply for a licence for a period, and should impose a financial sanction. Ms Navarette-Scholes’s response to this complaint [7] Ms Navarette-Scholes said she was suffering from a medical condition, and she was not able to work. The Registrar and the Complainant’s positions in relation to the Ly complaint [8] The Registrar took the sa...

2. OIA-120531.pdf [pdf, 847 KB]

   ...for finalised charges, not the number of criminal charges each year, and that you still sought this data. On 15 April, the Ministry contacted you informing you that an extension of the timeframe was required due to the need for consultation. In response to part 1 of your request, please see tables 1a and 1b attached. In response to parts 2, 3 and 4 of your request, please see table 2 attached. Page 1 of 4 s9(2)(a) s9(2)(a) https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research...

3. OIA-120441.pdf [pdf, 773 KB]

   ...have reached this point? The OIA team should still have my specific questions from last time. requesting an update on your previous request relating to legal aid information for Mr John Murchirahondo. We have treated this as a request for updated responses to the following questions in your previous request of 16 October 2024. • What did he receive legal aid for and at what times? How many lawyers? • How much in total have those lawyers been paid by legal aid in the past three yea...

4. OIA-122655.pdf [pdf, 828 KB]

   ...specific timeframe in which assignments have been allocated? Yes, over the past 12 months. Are you more interested in the process of how assignments are allocated? Yes, we are interested in the process. Your request has been referred to me for a response, as it falls within my responsibilities as the Legal Services Commissioner and is being managed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The majority of PAL 3 and 4 assignments are assigned to a nominated provider for criminal...

5. OIA-124183.pdf [pdf, 736 KB]

   ...4. Further, can I get a confirmation of the number of females vs males listed as perpetrators each year, for the past five years Please also explain any relevant caveats that should be kept in mind when analysing this information. In response to questions 1, 1a and 1b of your request, the Ministry does not hold information on the number of Protection Orders currently in force. This is due to the way that Protection Orders are recorded in the case management system used by th...

6. OIA-124501.pdf [pdf, 808 KB]

   ...individual charts concerned to update. Where relevant please add in the respective totals on a cumulative basis on a similar basis to appearing on the relevant sheets accordingly. As part of your request, you attached the Ministry’s previous response to OIA 116146, containing printing costs and applications data, relating to Property Relationships proceedings. The Ministry has therefore interpreted your request to be for updated information on the previous response. As previous...

7. OIA-124553.pdf [pdf, 774 KB]

   ...of location requested. On 13 August 2025, you clarified your request to be for Ashburton and Christchurch District Courts. On 13 August 2025, the Ministry transferred the following parts of your request to New Zealand Police (the Police) for response under section 14 of the Act: 1. How many protection orders were: - Breached - prosecuted in each of the Waimakariri and Hurunui Districts in the past 3 years (2022 – present). s9(2)(a) s9(2)(a) 3. How many family viole...

8. DV v WE LCRO 172 / 2010 (17 August 2011) [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...lack of evidence to support the claim that the Respondent made his complaint to avoid defamation proceedings or was a party to the posting of the defamatory comments; 3) The cross complaint made by the Applicant appeared to have been only in response to the original complaint made by the Respondent [8] The Applicant has applied for a review of this decision. Review [9] The review proceeded by way of an Applicant only hearing on 5 July 2011. [10] During the hearing I requested...

9. Han v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 19 [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...the defects and accept the evidence of Mr Wiemann and Mr Gill that these defects Page | 4 have resulted in the need to reclad the property and to remediate damaged timber framing. No evidence to the contrary was filed. [9] In their response to the claim, the Urlichs stated that the television cable defect was created after they had sold the property. I do not attribute responsibility for this defect to them. However, this does not cause any significant difference to...

10. Youth Court - 10 myths & misunderstandings about family group conferences (FGCs) [pdf, 165 KB]

    ...magnitude of a child offender’s offending. Myth 3 “All the young person got was an FGC”/ “The FGC is the only sentence they got” Reality The FGC is not the sentence at all. It is a decision making forum, convened to find a response to a young person’s offending which will hold the young person accountable, address the victim’s views and needs, and prevent future offending. The FGC will create a “plan” for the young person. This plan will include detailed...