Dawson v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Wellington 36 [pdf, 242 KB]
...moved from a realistic objective repair to an untested ideology. I determine from such expert opinion, that the appropriate repair option is a full reclad in accordance with the scope of works set out in Mr Hill‟s report. [60] OPC was not responsible for creating any of the above defects (all original construction). The claimants‟ claim in negligence against OPC, but there is no evidence that its 2005 remedial work exacerbated the position with the defects although I do...