15758 items matching your search terms
T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 8 1 4 T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E
...direction to refer Plan Change 7 to the Environment Court (8 April 2020) CB1472 12B Appendix B: Letter from Environmental Protection Authority commissioning Skelton report (15 September 2020) CB1474 12C Appendix C: Minister’s letter in response to Skelton report CB1476 12D Appendix D: Professor Skelton – Investigation of Freshwater Management and Allocation Functions at Otago Regional Council (1 October 2019) CB1480 2 TAB DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION PAGE NO 12E Appen...
...omission contained therein. This Report is intended solely for use by the Client in accordance with Stantec’s contract with the Client. While the Report may be provided to applicable authorities having jurisdiction and others for whom the Client is responsible, Stantec does not warrant the services to any third party. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express written consent of Stantec, which may be withheld at Stantec’s discretion. QUALITY STATEME...
...avoided the need for the application altogether. [5] In support of Air New Zealand’s application for costs, Mr Thompson submitted that the reason for the application for stay in the first place was the unreasonable stance of the plaintiffs in response to repeated reasonable proposals by the defendant to secure any amounts which would be determined as payable to the plaintiffs. He says the application for stay was a proper and necessary application. [6] He next submitt...
...this matter was conducted before Judge Perkins who gave a substantive judgment on 20 June 2007. In that judgment, he reserved costs with directions that Mr Nutsford was to file a memorandum within 14 days and Mr Orlov was file any memorandum in response within a further seven days. [2] Mr Nutsford filed a memorandum on behalf of the defendant on 25 June 2007, a copy of which was duly served on Mr Orlov. Mr Orlov did not file a memorandum on behalf of the plaintiff within the seven...
...that result, I expressed the preliminary view that costs should lie where they fall but left it open to either party to seek an award of costs if so minded. Ms Kennedy has now filed a memorandum seeking an award of costs to the defendant. In response, Ms Brown has filed a memorandum submitting that no order for costs should be made. [4] While Ms Kennedy’s submissions are lengthy and detailed, they make no mention of the defendant’s cross challenge and take no account of the fa...
...reimburse her for lost remuneration and in addition was awarded the sum of $5,000 by way of compensation. Costs were reserved but in a subsequent determination of the Authority, Ms Phillips received a costs award of $1,500. [3] In response to the challenge by the plaintiff, Ms Phillips filed a statement of defence and counter claim by way of cross-challenge. The counter claim effectively sought the same remedies as had been awarded by the Authority. A statement of d...
...act as lead counsel in this Court. She appeared in the Authority, although Mr Amodeo (who is an experienced practitioner) also had extensive involvement with the proceedings at that stage. He says, and I accept, that Ms Mayes has had primary responsibility for the preparation of the plaintiff’s case for hearing. While the possibility of Mr Amodeo appearing as sole counsel next week has been raised, that is not an option that the company is drawn to given Ms Mayes’ abilities,...
...matter in the Authority was employed by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). She finished working for MBIE on 15 July 2015, shortly before the Authority’s determination was received. Subsequently, the Manager who assumed responsibility for filing a challenge erred in her calculation as to the due date of filing for a statement of claim raising a challenge. She assumed it would be 17 August 2015, rather than 14 August 2015. The miscalculation was due to a...
...[10] Ms Kerr is currently unlicensed after having her licence cancelled due to non- compliance with her continuing education requirements.” [4] Since our said decision of 7 May 2015 our Registry has received no contact from the defendant nor any response to the Registry’s attempts to communicate with her. [5] Presumably that stance of non involvement or interest in this case of the defendant is because she has been unlicensed since January 2014. Discussion [6] The charge set out...