15758 items matching your search terms
...Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 AGAINST TT & SECURITY CO LIMITED HEARD by telephone on 2 September 2021 DECISION [1] AB has filed a complaint against TT and Security Co Ltd in relation to TT’s response to a shop lifting incident at the South Mall shopping centre on 25 July 2021. At the time TT was working as a security guard at a supermarket and AB says he breached the Act by not wearing a uniform or displaying his formal ID....
...expeditiously and in accordance with the provisions of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 and Unit Titles Act 2010, all disputes that are referred to the Tenancy Tribunal. Usually parties present their own cases and hearings are held in local District Courts. Responsible to: · Principal Tenancy Adjudicator Principal working relationships: (Excluding direct reporting relationship) · Court Manager and Service Manager local District Court/s. · Tenancy Clerk, local District Court/s. · Region...
...was made. Given the level of complexity of this matter, it is appropriately categorised as Category 1A, leading to a Scale costs calculation of approximately $3,400. [5] Although Mr Ututaonga and his agent, Mrs Henare provided submissions in response to the application for costs, those submissions were not directed to matters the Court considers in such applications. Mr Ututaonga took exception to the way Ms 2 $4,500 for the first day of an investigation meeting and $3,500 fo...
...that the noted deficiencies in OAL’s initially presented case are properly raised as relevant to the consideration of costs. In facing an appeal seeking full reversal of a first instance decision and hence decline of consent, a proponent bears responsibility to present a properly rounded and complete proposal to the court. In particular, that is in the context of the court’s de novo role in appeals. [6] The consequence of OAL not having done that is that Mr Wilson, having...
...confirm that: • No other payment, remuneration or benefit has been or will be received in respect of this work (unless authorised by Legal Aid). • Any non-lawyer or supervised provider performed his or her work under my supervision and I am responsible for it. • I have advised Legal Aid of all charges I am aware of against the customer named above. • If claiming hearing time, I have records of all hearing time covered by this claim. Signature of lead provider Date...
...reasonably incurred • No other payment, remuneration or benefit has been or will be received in respect of this work (unless authorised by Legal Aid). • Any non-lawyer or supervised provider performed his or her work under my supervision and I am responsible for it. I acknowledge that: • If this case is subject to a user charge, the total approved payment may be reduced by the amount of the user charge where the total approved is more than the user charge. Signature of lead...
...sexual violence to help them prepare to give evidence in a trial. The Ministry has initiated work on the problem definition and user needs to inform project planning and a provider has been sourced to do this work. If you are not satisfied with my response, you have the right to complain to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the OIA. The Ombudsman may be contacted by email at: info@ombudsman.parliament.nz Naku noa, na arl Crafar Chief Operating Officer Operations and Service Deliv...
...this slightly at the MS Teams hearing to indicate that Ms Beer’s mother had both chest and lung infections. 1 Filed on 1 June 2022. 2 [2022] NZEnvC 128. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] 3 The Auckland Council filed a memorandum in response later that morning and acknowledged the situation but then suggested: (a) that the matter may be able to proceed during this week without Ms Beer in attendance; (b) alternatively, that the Council’s application may be able to be...
...meant that the fuel tank had to be stripped down and cleaned out. She submitted a repair invoice dated 28 August 2019 from TI for $1,008.77. However, at the hearing IX did not pursue this claim and she did not present any evidence to show how HG was responsible for this damage. Therefore, this part of the claim is dismissed. 5. IX’s main claim against HG was that on 1 January 2021 he came to [Town] and he was very angry because his ute had been stolen. He blamed IX for the theft...
...reporting memorandum of 23 September 2022, the Council advised that an agreement was reached between the parties. Accordingly, the Council advised that it is unopposed to the granting of the stay of the abatement notice until 19 December 2022. In response, St Johns filed a memorandum on 28 September 2022 advising that on the basis the order is made staying the Notice until 19 December 2022, the appeal can be treated as withdrawn. Evaluation Under s 279(1)(b) of the Act, an E...