[2022] NZEmpC 119 H v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 175 KB]
...and inappropriate but required RPW to incur legal expense to rebut it. [11] H has not replied to RPW’s application for costs or Mr Hood’s submissions. The time allowed for him to respond has passed and enquiries by Registry staff about a response have gone unanswered. [12] There is no reason to delay this decision. An order of costs is appropriate. RPW has succeeded and is entitled to defray the expense it has incurred. I agree with Mr Hood that the appropriate costs categ...