Search Results

1. Hemi v Ritchie - Whaanga 1D1D Roadway (2025) 282 Waikato Maniapoto MB 9 (282 WMN 9) [pdf, 745 KB]

   ...vehicular access should be available to owners of Whaanga 1D1D along the whole of the roadway. That access does not exist at present because the roadway is not formed for a third of its length where it passes through the bush. It is not Mr Hemi’s responsibility to form that part of the roadway and no one else is proposing to do so. Nor is it likely, given the desirability of maintaining the bush area on the block because of its enhancement of the natural environs, that anyone else...

2. [2007] NZEmpC AC 28/07 Wilson v CE of Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...predecessor to the Ministry and the extent of her qualifications. [46] In the circumstances a moderate award of compensation is appropriate. I fix this at $4,000. As indicated earlier, no other remedies are sought. Ms Wilson acted appropriately and responsibly following the termination of her employment with the residence by seeking a job elsewhere with the Ministry. There was some break between the two periods of employment but in circumstances where any award of reimbursemen...

3. [2010] NZEmpC 30 Minhinnick V NZ Steel Ltd [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...crew for 2008/2009 is attached marked “A”. As can be seen from the availability roster, there is a colour- coding system that operates to inform employees whether they are employed to cover for day or night shifts. 8. The supervisor who is responsible for the crew provides each crew member with a hard copy of the roster. In addition, employees can access a copy of the roster from the company’s computer system. [6] The following clauses as they appear in the Rolling Mills Salar...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 137 Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd costs [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...and helpful written submissions were prepared traversing all matters in relation to the two challenges before the Court. Following the hearing a memorandum was filed on behalf of Mrs Stevens in relation to remedies. This reasonably required a response, although the issues raised were able to be dealt with by way of a brief memorandum. 5 At [27]. [9] I accept Mr Kiely’s submission that the personalised allegations...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 126 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...NZEmpC 64. [9] Next, on 5 June 2015, the plaintiff’s counsel wrote to the defendant’s counsel raising these issues and requesting confirmation whether the defendant’s counsel had discharged properly her disclosure obligations. A response was requested by Wednesday 10 June 2015. The plaintiff says that the defendant’s counsel delayed in responding to that letter requesting her assurance until the defendant filed, on 15 June 2015, a draft affidavit in the name of Ms...

6. CAC 10012 v Khan [2011] NZREADT 11 [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...that the vendor had received substantial money on-selling the property to his buyer and “should be grateful for the mandate. I have fulfilled and successfully therely (sic) given him a sizeable profit”. [16] Mr Delaney also referred to the response from Ray White dated 22 October 2009 (Tab 8, Exhibit 1). In that letter Ray White denied that Ms Khan had ever met or known Mr Taufiq Khan or Lise-Marie Aoese. [17] Subsequently Mr Delaney obtained documents from various sources...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 158 Gapuzan v Pratt & Whitney Air New Zealand Services t/a Christchurch Engine Centre [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...and, in about October 2011, raised a personal grievance alleging that the defendant had failed to provide him with a safe workplace. [7] On 5 December 2011, the plaintiff made a claim for accident compensation in relation to his right elbow. In response to that claim, the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) provided a standard form questionnaire for the defendant to complete as the plaintiff’s employer. It appears the form was given to the plaintiff on or about 7 December...

8. Lee v Couch - Rāpaki Marae 875 Sec 19 and others (2012) 12 Te Waipounamu MB 139 (12 TWP 139) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...of the participants supported the draft documents although two participants suggested further amendments. To assist in trying to resolve these issues I prepared two discussion documents setting out the comments from those two participants and my response to the requested amendments. I then sent this out to all participants on 2 September 2010. I sought feedback on those suggested amendments and advised that once this was resolved we will need to call a meeting of beneficiaries to vo...

9. Nimick & Anor v CAC 20005 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 11 [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...advertising was not unsatisfactory, and the print media advertising was extensive, varied, and sensitive to market reaction, and emphasised advertising in the Property Guide, various websites, window cards and sign-boards. The licensees had fairly similar responses to the appellant’s allegation of lack of advertising in the Property Press. [37] Mr Napier seemed to accept that Harcourts give a guarantee to customers of clear communication but submits that has no bearing on the present...

10. Stewart v CAC10064 & Cooper [2013] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 58 KB]

    ...This means that the appellant did expose the purchasers to the possibility of double commission. In terms of Rule 9.11, he did not inform the vendors that they were at risk of double commission by listing with Eves. [54] We do not accept that the responsibility rests with another salesperson at Eves and not with the appellant branch manager. The latter (the appellant) took control and was in control of the situation. [55] However we accept that the appellant was sincere in his effo...