Search Results

1. LG v KS & BS [2023] NZDT 311 (15 August 2023) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...day, a surgical procedure was carried out to repair Harry’s ear. That treatment cost $490.00. [4] LG provided photos of Harry’s injury, as well as receipts from the veterinary surgeon who had treated him. [5] LG considered BS and KS to be responsible for the vet’s bills. That was because, she said, their dog had been running loose and uncontrolled, and had approached and attacked Harry, who had been on a lead. She said the injury that had torn Harry’s ear was clearly a bite, a...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 125 Minister of Conservation v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...did not sign the consent memorandum. An email dated 22 May 3 2024 was issued affording further opportunity for Federated Farmers to seek leave to express their views on the relief sought by the other parties to be endorsed by the court. No response was received. The consent documentation has been processed on the basis that this party does not oppose the agreement reached. [7] Mr Meachen, Ngāti Apa ki te Rā Tō Trust, Ngāti Koata Trust, Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Kuia Trust and...

3. Kaupapa-Inquiry-Claimant-Form-Tuapapa-Events-Editable-v6.pdf [pdf, 427 KB]

   ...GST receipts or other supporting documentation for all expenses claimed? Send in this form You can fill in this form online and email it to claimantfunding@justice.govt.nz, or post to: Te Tāhū o te Ture – Ministry of Justice Crown Response to Justice System and Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiries SX 10088 Wellington New Zealand 5 Additional information for costs being claimed If needed use this additional space to fill in further information re...

4. NC v KU [2023] NZDT 425 (4 September 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...to how much it would cost. Furthermore, NC in the process of getting compliance completed a form to purchase RUCs and he included all the kilometres, not just from when he took ownership. This indicates that NC was aware of the unpaid RUCs and was responsible for them. If so, can NC claim $1,614.03? 7. Having found that there has not been any misrepresentation by KU, there are no grounds to award compensation, and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Nigel Wolland D...

5. DN v C Ltd & D Ltd [2023] NZDT 283 (12 July 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...the debt may have been more easily proved. [14] For the reasons outlined above and, on the evidence presented to the Tribunal I am not satisfied the respondent has met its burden of proving on the balance of probabilities that the applicant is responsible for any loss. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to the declaration sought and the counterclaim is dismissed. 1 His last name was not given to the Tribunal, and he has not appeared or provided any direct evidence to the Trib...

6. Evidence-of-R-Schimpf.pdf [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...by the Equestrian Groups - Internet searches on road safety in general and that relating to horses being ridden on public roads. 11. The scope of this statement of evidence does not extend to identifying consequential amendments needed in response to the concerns raised. 12. For ease of administration, this statement of evidence focuses only on areas of remaining concerns. Where I do not specifically address issues raised in the Groups’ submission I either agree wi...

7. ND v MI Ltd [2024] NZDT 267 (8 May 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...maintenance of the item yet it has not yielded the result as promised by MI Ltd. 6. He says after taking all the steps as per the manual only about 15 cocoons hatched out of the 75 received. He is disappointed that MI Ltd have refused to take any responsibility for this. 7. MI Ltd dispute that majority of the cocoons did not hatch. They say from the photos provided by ND, a lot of the cocoons have in fact hatched as they can see exit holes in them. They say they follow a process o...

8. XM & KM v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 716 (15 August 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...and KM chose not to pursue their accommodation costs and so I have not considered whether they would be entitled to these as a reasonably foreseeable consequential loss. 15. For completeness, I note that the contract states at clause 15 “…No responsibility for out of pocket expenses, including accommodation charges or meals or loss of enjoyment resulting from a breakdown or accident will be accepted…” However, U Ltd is unable to contract out of its obligations under the CGA in...

9. HT v BM [2024] NZDT 711 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...and HT agreed in the hearing that this was so. HT said that the washing machine was smaller by about half a kilogram’s capacity, but the main issue was that the machine had a foul smell and a closer inspection showed that it was mouldy. BM’s response was that this was normal with second hand machines, and it would not take much to clean it up. However HT added that the previous washing machine which was the subject of the first hearing had not arrived in such a dirty unhygienic stat...

10. B Ltd v UT & QT [2024] NZDT 714 (28 August 2024) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...the two houses at [address]. 5. According to the agreement, B Ltd were to make available to UT and QT all documents and certificates within their control and necessary for the release of the CCC by [the Local Council]. UT and QT would then be responsible for obtaining the CCC from Council. The settlement agreement and payment were to be in full and final settlement of all claims by the parties against the other arising from the contract and all incidental matters pertaining to it....